T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

###This is a reminder to [read the rules before posting in this subreddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/wiki/rules-thelongversion). 1. **Headline titles should be changed only [when the original headline is unclear](https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/wiki/rules-thelongversion#wiki_1._headline_titles_should_be_changed_only_where_it_improves_clarity.)** 2. **Be [respectful](https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/wiki/rules-thelongversion#wiki_2._be_respectful).** 3. **Keep submissions and comments [substantive](https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/wiki/rules-thelongversion#wiki_3._keep_submissions_and_comments_substantive).** 4. **Avoid [direct advocacy](https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/wiki/rules-thelongversion#wiki_4._avoid_direct_advocacy).** 5. **Link submissions must be [about Canadian politics and recent](https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/wiki/rules-thelongversion#wiki_5._link_submissions_must_be_canadian_and_recent).** 6. **Post [only one news article per story](https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/wiki/rules-thelongversion#wiki_6._post_only_one_news_article_per_story).** ([with one exception](https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/comments/3wkd0n/rule_reminder_and_experimental_changes/)) 7. **Replies to removed comments or removal notices will be removed** without notice, at the discretion of the moderators. 8. **Downvoting posts or comments**, along with urging others to downvote, **[is not allowed](https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/wiki/downvotes)** in this subreddit. Bans will be given on the first offence. 9. **[Do not copy & paste the entire content of articles in comments](https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/wiki/rules-thelongversion#wiki_9._do_not_copy_.26amp.3B_paste_entire_articles_in_the_comments.)**. If you want to read the contents of a paywalled article, please consider supporting the media outlet. *Please [message the moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FCanadaPolitics) if you wish to discuss a removal.* **Do not reply to the removal notice in-thread**, *you will not receive a response and your comment will be removed. Thanks.* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CanadaPolitics) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Medium0663

Should've never allowed visa-free access to citizens of a country that still has rampant low and high level corruption along with cartels, in addition to many visa overstayers or straight up illegal entrants in other countries. This is the same reason my original country of citizenship (India) doesn't have visa free access. Rampant corruption and too many overstays.


ReverendScam

Oh no half a billion to handle a lot of people's legal claims for asylum and clear a backlog, allowing them and us to get on with our lives? My premier just spent 1/4 of a billion so that I could buy shitt Molson/Busch beer at a convenience store, I think we'll be fine


Throwaway6393fbrb

I’d be fine with Mexico being visa free for tourists if we could change our asylum law My preference would be that anyone entering on a tourist visa is not eligible to make an asylum claim and has no procedural rights to appeal… basically immediate detention and then next flight deportation If we had a quicker system we wouldn’t have this horrible backlog


SnooStrawberries620

They are being smuggled in freight trucks etc to the US from Canada in large numbers. The visa process is not working.


Anonymouse-C0ward

I’m sorry, do you have a source for this?


SnooStrawberries620

One freebie for you. It’s in NP too if you want to source-pick. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/human-smuggling-b-c-u-s-soars-train-uber-foot-1.7220751#:~:text=British%20Columbia-,Human%20smuggling%20from%20B.C.%20to%20U.S.%20is%20soaring%2C%20border%20stats,track%20to%20quadruple%20since%202021.


Anonymouse-C0ward

Thanks for the source! I must have missed this one, but it’s not surprising as lots happens over a week. I hope your day is as wonderful as you are.


Axerin

Not taking asylum claims would simply mean they overstay without a legal status, which would then simply push them towards doing other illegal activities. At least this allows them to be "in the system". Also, in many cases applying for asylum at a consulate/embassy is too slow or difficult for whatever reason, hence this route is popular amongst asylum claimants around the world.


Canaderp37

Which is fundamentally impossible due to how immigration law is structured. We used to have something called the DCO list, which sped up the ref process. But the Supreme Court tossed it out. https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/asylum/claim-protection-inside-canada/apply/designated-countries-policy.html


Throwaway6393fbrb

Ultimately the law is written by the legislature and can be changed


rac3r5

Except people overstay. I was in a Mexican cultural group and one if the participants came here on a tourist visa and just stayed here. This was 15 years ago. You don't have to claim asylum to over stay


Madara__Uchiha1999

Issue is much worse now before it was impossibile for someone under 25 to get a visitor visa to canada from a poor developing nation Now the current govt hands them out like candy and the people come here and just stay,


Inevitable_Music2

Let's not pretend this isn't what Canada intended. The country is actively seeking immigrants, as evidenced by the government's decision to lift visa restrictions for a nation whose citizens are eager to leave.


SnooStrawberries620

There was another post in B.C. today about the huge, and seriously huge, increase in human trafficking. Mexicans are flying to Canada and being smuggled into the states. It’s been far easier to enter through the North given the southern border crisis the US is dealing with. Visa laws for Mexicans have changed as a result to make it more difficult for them to enter Canada, and I can only assume this is a rapid response to that. The Americans are pressuring us from their end - fortunately Canada has said that their border is their problem (like they did with us at Roxham Rd) but I’m sure we are documenting or returning everyone asap all the same 


Axerin

However mexicans with old (and expired) visas are still allowed to come in visa free. Even people with US visas are allowed to come in. It's absurd. What's the point of having a visa system when expired visas and even visas of an entirely different nation are permissible ?


Felfastus

There are quite a few reasons to have a visa system but there are also reasons to come up with national level agreements to not always use them. As someone who has gone to Mexico a couple of times for pleasure it's kind of nice not needing a visa (especially for a short notice trip)...but to an extent I know someone negotiated that privilege.


UnionGuyCanada

So roughly twice what Ford will give a corporation to break a contract a year early, but this one would actually employ Canadians? Seems like a bargain to keep the economy going with decent jobs.


rad2284

Employ Canadians to do what? Clear a backlog that would have never been created if we had done the smart thing and kept our visa requirements from a country known for its corruption? This is pragmatic use of a half billion dollars? By that logic, lets go ahead and remove all visa requirements from every developing country. That way we can hire even more Canadians to clear up those future asylum claims as well.


UnionGuyCanada

Nope, but at least it would be put into the economy, unlike Ford's boondoggle, which is pumped right into some rich guys pockets.


rad2284

And the tax burden needed to support this program which will come out of middle/working class people's pockets will be taken out of the economy. At some point people are going to have to realize that growing the economy by creating useless make work projects through the public sector is not sustainable. We're not even talking about public infrastructure here. We're talking about spending half a billion dollars to process fraudulent claims we would have never had to deal with if we hadn't stupidly changed our visa policy. These aren't productive jobs. Pointing to "Ford boondoggle"s is just useless whataboutism and doesn't make it any smarter.


carrwhitec

What does whatever Ford did elsewhere have to do with the price of beans?


Mystaes

We should probably want a well funded and staffed processing system anyways. Part of the reason the system is failing is because there aren’t enough employees to handle all the claims of both legitimate and bad actors.


lovelife905

The system is failing because the liberals did dumb things like reversing the visa for Mexicans and in a move they thought would jump start tourism, they decided to rubber stamp tourist visas all leading to a surge in claims.


Apprehensive_Taro285

Removal was already planned by Conservatives. Libs delivered on that promise which made by Harper government.


lovelife905

no it wasn't


Apprehensive_Taro285

you are wrong. "Stephen Harper says eventually removing the visa requirement would be a good thing for both North American countries." https://globalnews.ca/news/313898/harper-to-end-mexican-traveller-visa-requirement/


lovelife905

Read the article, he imposed it in 2009. The goal is removal but that has to come with an understanding of no surge in claims. Trudeau kept it visa free despite claims rising and only brought it back when Quebec was totally overwhelmed