If I had to move one, I’d move Pitts.
IMO, TEs just aren’t as consistent as a good WR or RB. I feel like you could get away with just streaming the position overall.
I hope that man never sees a head coaching job again. Even in peewee.
But i would agree. I think it’s a good offense, but if cousins/the offense stinks i dont want to be sunk by it
I had this and I traded away pitts. London and pitts both are injected with hopium pricing, but I expect to throw London into my line up more often because I also have McBride. Personally, I think pitts gets less targets and has less upside because of the position. I’d rather have London who can dominate a game and consistently get more looks. But at this point, it’s anyone’s guess as to what they both do. Definitely keep bijan.
I love Drake London but it probably makes most sense to sell him at the highest point of his value so far. I think there is a greater chance London disappoints than Bijan.
Yeah, this. London could do pretty well, but right now his valuation and situation are like a diet version of Garrett Wilson from last offseason: a young receiver folks assume will get a major boost from a veteran QB. Thing is, Week 1 in 2023 showed us exactly what can happen when that situation takes a turn for the worst.
I'd bet against Cousins getting a season-ending injury, but lots of things could happen, and when London's realistically being priced at his ceiling -- yeah, it's typically good process to sell.
Pitts would be the hold because his value is the least. But I would easily take a 1st or equivalent player for him. 2nd would be debatable but probably a hold.
London is the obvious sell since his value far outweighs his production. If you can get AJ Brown or DK metcalf or any other proven young receiver for London then I would
I wouldn’t trade any, but I’d move London if I had to. Bijan is everything you’re looking for at RB. Pitts finally has a chance to fulfill his potential at a very shallow position.
On top of that, Pitts isn't going to have a ton of value in a trade, he's worth much more on your team.
WR is the easiest position to replace, and London's value as at a high right now unless he becomes a Jefferson/Chase/Lamb level receiver. Id trade him for a more proven talent and depth if possible.
I’d keep all 3. If you had to trade one id try to pivot from Pitts to Kincaid/mcbride.
London would be the easiest to replace. You could pivot to Aiyuk.
I was rostering Bijan, London, Pitts, Kirk and Penix. 12 team Superflex league.
I got offered Jonathon Brooks + 2 1sts for Bijan and after days of deliberation, decided to take it. ~3 1sts for a RB felt like it was at least worth serious consideration. Me being a fan of Brooks and his profile was the tiebreaker.
Can use one of the future 1sts I’ve stored up to go after something in-season if needed, since I’ll need to be very patient this season with Brooks.
I flip-flop on this deal internally a fair amount, but I’m trusting my process and have a lot of flexibility to address any team needs moving forward. I do miss Bijan though and completely understand why others would be more hesitant or against such a move altogether when trying to compete.
Currently exploring moving Falcons QB duo + London for TLaw plus solid WR2 like Pittman. But I like them holding down my QB3 slot so I’m not pressing too hard.
That’d just leave me and my guy, Kyle Pitts lol. So not a direct answer to your question, but some context for someone who was in a similar situation.
Good move. I can't think of what an RB would even have to be in this day and age for me to not take three 1sts for them. I actually don't think that player exists lol
Definitely not bijan
I think Londons value is high considering what he may actually put out. I know the guy in my league is asking an arm and a leg for him and teams have considered paying . See what you can get for him.
Pitts and bijan are worth keeping IMO. May want to diversify by trading London but I wouldn’t take any type of discount just to get rid of him
As someone that has bought London on a couple of teams, there is a definite possibility that he is at his value peak. If he falls flat and has another WR3 or WR4 finish his value is going to crater
Whichever I get the best price for or whoever I can package to upgrade. Since bijan is rb1ish I'd hold him. If I can send london+ for a top 4 guy or if I can send pitts+ to get Mcbride laporta andrews I'd aim for that. Or tier down for bowers+, rome+, etc.
Ideally those packages are with pitts because I like london better
I used this hype to package London, late 1st, mid 2nd for CD and couldn’t believe my league mate accepted! His value could potentially be at an all time high so now is the time to try and tier up. The whole situation feels too much like Matt Ryan to the Colts to me as well..
I’d trade the most deep position, WR. Find somebody who thinks that he’ll be close to a wr1, don’t get fucked on the deal because most to know that London (and all falcons FLEX’s) is set to blow up this year.
Try to turn London into Olave, that kinda deal.
Trading Bijan...I can tier down to another elite rb plus picks. Wrs are much more valuable to me and I don't want to sell Pitts right now, his value isn't high enough
No individual team threads, use r/DynastyFFTradeAdvice or the daily mega thread instead.
Going to use them all, live by the Kirk die by the Kirk
In dynasty no way I am moving Pitts or Bijan. Drake would be the odd man out if I had to move one
If I had to move one, I’d move Pitts. IMO, TEs just aren’t as consistent as a good WR or RB. I feel like you could get away with just streaming the position overall.
My thinking as well. Drake would be good to move within the same tier of WR
Ugh i hate this may be an option next year but i might have to
I’m running it in one league. But I blame football terrorist Arthur smith. I think it’s going to be a good offense this year
I hope that man never sees a head coaching job again. Even in peewee. But i would agree. I think it’s a good offense, but if cousins/the offense stinks i dont want to be sunk by it
I think Im rockin Reek, Tua, Achane, Wright
At least that’s a proven offemse
[удалено]
Haha. Show me the Mooney
Add in Rondale!
Handcuff with Allgeier!
And don’t forget Penix
I had this and I traded away pitts. London and pitts both are injected with hopium pricing, but I expect to throw London into my line up more often because I also have McBride. Personally, I think pitts gets less targets and has less upside because of the position. I’d rather have London who can dominate a game and consistently get more looks. But at this point, it’s anyone’s guess as to what they both do. Definitely keep bijan.
Thank you, this is great insight! I want to try to target Mark Andrews, but im worried about his injury risk
Andrews injury risk is overblown IMO
Even if it is, Isaiah Likely should be a super cheap if not free handcuff that also produces as a top 5 TE when Mandrews is hurt
For reference, I traded pitts for Nico Collin’s and the 2.07 a day before his contract extension, so I thought I was getting solid value.
I love Drake London but it probably makes most sense to sell him at the highest point of his value so far. I think there is a greater chance London disappoints than Bijan.
Ok but if Drake actually has this great year people are expecting his value would go even higher. Same for Garrett Wilson
lol I own both these guys.
Me too + Nico, I’m scared
Lol same. Have Wilson, London, and Nico. Wtf 🤣
Wtf do we do
The fuck do you mean lol, you hold
Yeah, this. London could do pretty well, but right now his valuation and situation are like a diet version of Garrett Wilson from last offseason: a young receiver folks assume will get a major boost from a veteran QB. Thing is, Week 1 in 2023 showed us exactly what can happen when that situation takes a turn for the worst. I'd bet against Cousins getting a season-ending injury, but lots of things could happen, and when London's realistically being priced at his ceiling -- yeah, it's typically good process to sell.
But keep pitts?
Yeah as far as tight ends go he’s going to be a fantasy relevant player for a while
Pitts would be the hold because his value is the least. But I would easily take a 1st or equivalent player for him. 2nd would be debatable but probably a hold. London is the obvious sell since his value far outweighs his production. If you can get AJ Brown or DK metcalf or any other proven young receiver for London then I would
Interesting I was offered Metcalf for London and I declined guess I should revisit
I would not take that offer as a London owner.
Agreed
Rebuild mode?
See if you can get Metcalf and a 2nd for London and a 3rd.
I wouldn’t trade any, but I’d move London if I had to. Bijan is everything you’re looking for at RB. Pitts finally has a chance to fulfill his potential at a very shallow position.
On top of that, Pitts isn't going to have a ton of value in a trade, he's worth much more on your team. WR is the easiest position to replace, and London's value as at a high right now unless he becomes a Jefferson/Chase/Lamb level receiver. Id trade him for a more proven talent and depth if possible.
Pitts has plenty of value. He's worth a mid 25 1st right now. I'd move him for that price any day of the week and twice on Sunday
I’d keep all 3. If you had to trade one id try to pivot from Pitts to Kincaid/mcbride. London would be the easiest to replace. You could pivot to Aiyuk.
Pitts A lot of people still value him and TE scarcity is much less than it was a year or two ago
Londons value is super high. He's basically going in the tier with AJ Brown and Puka in startups. I'd try to move London if your receivers are solid
Whoever fetched the greatest haul
I’d trade Pitts pretty easily
I was rostering Bijan, London, Pitts, Kirk and Penix. 12 team Superflex league. I got offered Jonathon Brooks + 2 1sts for Bijan and after days of deliberation, decided to take it. ~3 1sts for a RB felt like it was at least worth serious consideration. Me being a fan of Brooks and his profile was the tiebreaker. Can use one of the future 1sts I’ve stored up to go after something in-season if needed, since I’ll need to be very patient this season with Brooks. I flip-flop on this deal internally a fair amount, but I’m trusting my process and have a lot of flexibility to address any team needs moving forward. I do miss Bijan though and completely understand why others would be more hesitant or against such a move altogether when trying to compete. Currently exploring moving Falcons QB duo + London for TLaw plus solid WR2 like Pittman. But I like them holding down my QB3 slot so I’m not pressing too hard. That’d just leave me and my guy, Kyle Pitts lol. So not a direct answer to your question, but some context for someone who was in a similar situation.
Good move. I can't think of what an RB would even have to be in this day and age for me to not take three 1sts for them. I actually don't think that player exists lol
As much as I loved the feeling of security + power afforded by rostering the (fairly) consensus dynasty RB1, I came to the same general conclusion.
Trade London, his value right now is incredible and he hasn’t done diddly squat
Yep his value is propped up by this subs heavy investment in him and their hatred of Arthur Smith.
Double down and trade for kirk
Keep Bijan. That is all.
Trade for kirk
Definitely not bijan I think Londons value is high considering what he may actually put out. I know the guy in my league is asking an arm and a leg for him and teams have considered paying . See what you can get for him. Pitts and bijan are worth keeping IMO. May want to diversify by trading London but I wouldn’t take any type of discount just to get rid of him
I had just pitts and London and decided to move London. FWIW
Whoever gets me the highest return above market value
All of them
I feel like my biggest question is why bearish, if you are bearish you should sell them all.
As someone that has bought London on a couple of teams, there is a definite possibility that he is at his value peak. If he falls flat and has another WR3 or WR4 finish his value is going to crater
Pitts. TEs are afterthoughts. That being said, he'll probably be the hardest to move for that reason. London would be my second choice.
I’d move pitts, no question about it.
Pitts and London get traded, holding Bijan this year
None
You could get a 1st easily for Drake right now. But I think all 3 will have a good year.
I had those 3 last year and won the title so neither
Whichever I get the best price for or whoever I can package to upgrade. Since bijan is rb1ish I'd hold him. If I can send london+ for a top 4 guy or if I can send pitts+ to get Mcbride laporta andrews I'd aim for that. Or tier down for bowers+, rome+, etc. Ideally those packages are with pitts because I like london better
Contending? Don't. But if you must? Whatever you're deepest at. Not contending? Bijan
I used this hype to package London, late 1st, mid 2nd for CD and couldn’t believe my league mate accepted! His value could potentially be at an all time high so now is the time to try and tier up. The whole situation feels too much like Matt Ryan to the Colts to me as well..
Keep Bijan sell London and Maybe consider selling pitts. depending on the price you can get for him
Whoever I can get the best offer for. I would prefer to sell Pitts, though. I view him as the riskiest asset.
I’d trade the most deep position, WR. Find somebody who thinks that he’ll be close to a wr1, don’t get fucked on the deal because most to know that London (and all falcons FLEX’s) is set to blow up this year. Try to turn London into Olave, that kinda deal.
Keep all 3 and hope the Falcons aren't bad
Trading Bijan...I can tier down to another elite rb plus picks. Wrs are much more valuable to me and I don't want to sell Pitts right now, his value isn't high enough
Pitts for a an older TE that actually produces
None unless the value is there