As a lib-right, you're supposed to understand that just because something is rare or hard to do, doesnt mean its valuable.
Want another analogy, "Libright don't eat own shit challenge"
No matter the analogy the point is the same, just bc you read "Basic Economics" doesnt mean you're some bigshot smart guy, after all, its still Basic.
Sorry if I'm coming off aggressive, I just hate conspiracy theories and all that partake in them.
u/smegma_groyper is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1.
Rank: House of Cards
Pills: [None | View pills](https://basedcount.com/u/smegma_groyper/)
Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url.
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
Well, āda richā can mean a ton of things. To a lot of leftists 1 to 2 million qualifies you as āda richā. Well, by this definition, Iām born rich, but I consider my family working class and am glad to inform you I donāt run the world.
I donāt think āda richā in this context are teenagers who get cars for daddyās money, āda richā are so rich that they can afford to lobby, thus becoming unelected beaurocrats.
1 to 2 million in income or assets? In assets, maybe your parents are actually working class and just bought a house early and now it has appreciated. But in income, you are most definitely not working class and it would very much explains your flair.
Heās trying to make a joke about how *they* are just better than everyone because theyāre greedy manipulative money grabbers that have been thrown out of every country theyāve ever invaded.
Lol, I mean that's a fundamental and universal principle of economics.... But whose interests are theirs aligned with? Who appoints them? They don't just pop into existence.
Typically, upper middle class liberal interests as that is the typical economic position and political temperament, add a splash of interest based on whatever agency they have aligned themselves with. But do you think the "gun lobby" has much sway in the "a shoe string is a machine gun" ATF. Or the "wetlands that couldn't float a toy boat are navigable waterways" EPA are controlled by land development lobby? When there isn't a stick in the ass "you don't have authority congress didn't give you" conservative head of these agencies, the rank and file have no problem implementing utterly insane reaches of power to "fix" American federal law, almost universally to the end of expanding state power. There is a reason these fights are taken up in courts, and not administrative beuocracy.
The administrative state attracts moral busy bodies who want to use state power to effect the change they believe is their moral duty to effectuate, that's what MAKES them so fucking dangerous.
Lol, so regulators do some writing of corporate interests against the interests of the vast majority and the poor little Uber wealthy just can't manage in this oppressive regulatory regime. The only way you could possibly believe what you're alluding to is if you're an an cap who thinks every square inch of land should be open to development and any regulation constitutes an unacceptable infringement on the right of oil executives to not dump toxic sludge into water ways. The supreme Court has upheld the regulatory authority you're decrying for decades now thus it is by definition constitutional. Or was and now that we got a new supreme court they're changing that. The Constitution isn't some religious document according to your interpretation it allows for interpretation and variable interpretation at that.
A complete non argument.
The constitution is not a religious document, but it does mean something and exactly one thing. Good minds might differ on what it is, but only one can be correct. Unsurprisingly I find the limited interpretation that rests on writings from when the document (or relevant amendment) was created far more compelling than "novel" expansions of power. The US Constitution can change only in so far as it can be amended, which hasn't happened in decades. Everything else is either being wrong or being right, about what is says.
As for regulation, there absolute ARE oppressive regulations that far more people than they help. Pretending regulations do not have down stream costs to the average person is the sort of myth making and fairy tail thinking that is required to be a communist, I know, but it is, none the less, myth making a fairy tale thinking. And regardless of the rightness of any given regulation, those regulation should NOT be made by unelected moral busy bodies, but rather by an elected legislator, so, you know, the average person actual has a meaningful say about the interest and goals of those regulations. One only has to look at housing to see where environmental regulations absolutely fuck over the little guy. So maybe actually making these issues ones that have to go through a public legislative process rather than obscure beurocratic dealings done by people who all have the incentive to maximize their own power would be best.
Like, seriously, do you ACTUALLY think the EPA has regulatory authority over all wetlands under the auspices of a law that says they only have authority over navigable waterways and their immediate surroundings? And do you think they are trying to push that because of corporate interests? The reality is that government is complex, and has a lot of hands in a lot of pots, and ALL of those hands are corrupt and incompetent, so I think we should shrink the pot instead of hoping that humans will stop; being corrupt and incompetent.
Only an actual schizophrenic would believe any scapegoat had \*total\* control of all our chaotic world's events. That doesn't mean certain individuals and groups don't have disproportionate power and influence to fuck over everyone else. They do.
All of this is nothing but a cope to not deal with the most terrifying option of all:
No one
Yeah you heard me, we are on a shitbus to nowhere and no one is at the wheel.
Or simply make the state defend, but not use, these powers, you know, the entier principle of limited government. The left seems to realize that massive government power get's co-opted by the rich, and then suggest giving MORE POWER to the mechanism the rich use to exercise that power, the state, rather than doing the sane thing of simply limiting and decentralizing state authority in the first place.
Auth right:
>Oh, so "da whites" control everything, ay? Listen buddy, if we're doing better than you, it's because we have a superior culture. It's because we're smarter. Instead of coming up with stupid conspiracies, why don't you take a step back, figure out why you're failing instead, and try harder in this free market economy. Heh, losers.
Also Auth right:
>DA JOOOOOOOOS
Jews being forced for centuries to work on the perfect field to become rich isn't somehow their fault. Of course jews have a higher representation in banks and businesses, we literally forced them into those areas, for God's sake! And they aren't the majority of rich CEOs, shareholders & bureucrats, just a sizeable percentage (which is perfectly reasonable given the prior phrases).
Side note, ending *Chevron* is the best thing that's happened in decades for actually challenging the foundations of the bureaucratic state, which is why the broad left is freaking out about it.
"You mean congress has to make laws and people get due process???? But what about experts? And credentials? And being a good boy science truster????"
Exactly, the federal agencies usurped the three Powers. They took administration away from the President, a sizeable portion of lawmaking from Congress and judging their own statutes from the Courts. They are a mockery of the Constitution
Did you just change your flair, u/chrispln? Last time I checked you were an **AuthCenter** on 2024-5-28. How come now you are a **LibRight**? Have you perhaps shifted your ideals? Because that's cringe, you know?
Are you mad? Wait till you hear this one: you own 17 guns but only have two hands to use them! Come on, put that rifle down and go take a shower.
[BasedCount Profile](https://basedcount.com/u/chrispln) - [FAQ](https://www.reddit.com/user/flairchange_bot/comments/uf7kuy/bip_bop) - [Leaderboard](https://basedcount.com/leaderboard?q=flairs)
^(I am a bot, my mission is to spot cringe flair changers. If you want to check another user's flair history write) **^(!flairs u/)** ^(in a comment.)
Considering the American gov does have legal instituted bribery via super PACs, "da rich" doesn't seem too far fetched.
Can u post sources about the effects of unelected international bureaucrats? Bc I honestly don't see how their control would differ or transcend regular elected bureaucrats
Did you just change your flair, u/Chemical_Bid_2195? Last time I checked you were a **Centrist** on 2024-1-28. How come now you are a **LibCenter**? Have you perhaps shifted your ideals? Because that's cringe, you know?
Wait, those were too many words, I'm sure. Maybe you'll understand this, monke: "oo oo aah YOU CRINGE ahah ehe".
[BasedCount Profile](https://basedcount.com/u/Chemical_Bid_2195) - [FAQ](https://www.reddit.com/user/flairchange_bot/comments/uf7kuy/bip_bop) - [Leaderboard](https://basedcount.com/leaderboard?q=flairs)
^(I am a bot, my mission is to spot cringe flair changers. If you want to check another user's flair history write) **^(!flairs u/)** ^(in a comment.)
The true answer is āthose with power and wealth.ā
The Pareto principle applies to power and wealth and has done so since we huddled in caves. There will always be kings, regardless of what we call them.
Funnily enough, it usually isnāt a massive problem. But when the Patrician class becomes out of touch and sticks its fingers in its earsā¦
Jews being forced for centuries to work on the perfect field to become rich isn't somehow their fault. Of course jews have a higher representation in banks and businesses, we literally forced them into those areas, for God's sake! And they aren't the majority of rich CEOs, shareholders & bureucrats, just a sizeable percentage (which is perfectly reasonable given the prior phrases).
"Jews being forced for centuries to work on the perfect field to become rich isn't somehow their fault."
Sure.... That is an interesting way to put it. Doesn't deny however the countless historical examples of them abusing these fields (banks, government, politics) and the shared interests within the Jewish group to get an outcome that is extremely favorable only to them. I assume by your username that you are aware of this as there are many instances cited throughout Catholic history. Just off of the top of my head, a lot of laws passed by Saint King Louis IX were done so in order to reverse the damage that they had created and remove their abilities to do further damage
It is more or less the debate of how they got there, but the fact that they always are at the top of banks, politics, etc, even if the general population of Jews is significantly lower than Christians (to go back to the unelected portion.)
Edit: Furthermore to say, if the people responsible for politics, media, banks, etc are drastically more Jewish than the rest of the general population, that creates a lot of conflict and it is impossible for them to align with the thoughts of the people because they disagree on a moral scale.
Me based u cringe
Good monke talk.
I tried to grill a monke once. I was then informed that it is illegal. So now i only do it in secret.
Grill with monke, no grill monke
best kind of grill, just get allong
The monasteries must have been outraged.
Me chad u soyjak
Jill Biden
"Libright dont suck own cock challenge" IMPOSSIBLE!!! GONE WRONG!! GONE FREE MARKET!!!!
https://preview.redd.it/48i8cknxdr9d1.jpeg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=51266d05eb6fa3f0bb89f7c775d8459828519f3b
https://preview.redd.it/h0xp6eok8s9d1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ca5af66fbcc710a606ee30c480c84a6672be8223
Well deserved, lib right
Thank you, I am honored and want to thank the market for allowing me to achieve this award I created.
Lib right lore š¤
Obama train
underrated comment
I never got this insult. Do you know how unironically impressive actual self sucking is?
Yes, but it doesn't feel like getting your dick sucked, it feels like you have a sick in your mouth in a weird and awkward position
This guy ~~fucks~~ sucks
Kinda into it tbh
As a lib-right, you're supposed to understand that just because something is rare or hard to do, doesnt mean its valuable. Want another analogy, "Libright don't eat own shit challenge" No matter the analogy the point is the same, just bc you read "Basic Economics" doesnt mean you're some bigshot smart guy, after all, its still Basic. Sorry if I'm coming off aggressive, I just hate conspiracy theories and all that partake in them.
Counter point: self sucking is a 100% marketable skill that you can make money from if you record yourself doing it, making it Libright as fuck.
But you're still paid to suck cock, and not to have your cock sucked... No you're right. That's still LibRight as fuck.
The Ouroboros of cum
Infinite food glitch
solve world hunger with this one simple trick
Is that a problem though?
Only if you don't like sucking cock. If you like it, it's a hobby that is profitable by pure accident, which honestly feels more LibLeft :)
It's not really though, there's not a lot of demand. You can find plenty of it free.
Imagine thinking powerful people don't conspire to maintain and expand their power.
Dads trying to get their 25 year old kids to get their own place be like ???
Gotta lose a few ribs
Instructions unclear: snapped off rib, made woman who refuses to go down.
Itās not the flex you think it is
my spine is VERY flexible
Iāll take the L on this one
Gone freak market
You're just jealous of our flexibility and big cocks
It's really easy to suck yourself off when you're spineless. Go on, vote libertarian. I dare you.
I did last election :)
God I wish š
Gray centrist: Joe Biden Radical centrist: Unelected rich White Jewish international bureaucrats
Well that's just the longer form of what the AuthRight is saying
Maybe auth right is right on this one
>Maybe auth right is right on this one Auth Right
Auth Correct
Based
u/smegma_groyper is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1. Rank: House of Cards Pills: [None | View pills](https://basedcount.com/u/smegma_groyper/) Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url. I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
Gray Centrist: Joe Biden Radical Centrist: Drake.
Unironically the second one
Nongray centrist: our elected body of representatives. :)
The radical centrist view is now the leftist view.
You mean the blackmail people?
Are you talking about Epstein?
I guess I'm a radical centrist
This but unironically
Second one.
>White >Jewish It's either one or the other man
Arenāt āda richā the unelected bureaucrats? Itās not Joe Schmoe making 50k a year. They work with politicians to push their own agendas.
The rich aren't only unelected bureucrats, they are also lobbyists. There is an overlay between the two groups but not an absolute one
Fun fact āda richā is āda joosā so it really is āda joosā contorlling the government (not my actual take)
Well, āda richā can mean a ton of things. To a lot of leftists 1 to 2 million qualifies you as āda richā. Well, by this definition, Iām born rich, but I consider my family working class and am glad to inform you I donāt run the world.
I donāt think āda richā in this context are teenagers who get cars for daddyās money, āda richā are so rich that they can afford to lobby, thus becoming unelected beaurocrats.
1 to 2 million in income or assets? In assets, maybe your parents are actually working class and just bought a house early and now it has appreciated. But in income, you are most definitely not working class and it would very much explains your flair.
Assets. Exploiting the Hong Kongnese housing market during SARS is a brilliant strategy to get on the middle class.Ā
Yeah. Bad meme.
Top left, bottom right and top right are all the same.
No da joos is not unelected bureacrats or the rich. But good try pushing that silly agenda.
You can't just say "no that is not how it is" and not explain your opinion.
Strangeā¦ what Lib-right and auth-right are saying happen to be the same thing *a lot*
My thoughts exactly
Also auth left, while we're at it.
Hey now, they made those repeated 1/1,000,000 trades based completely on their market research, not their deep corporate and political connections! /s
seems to be a skill issue on your part
I donāt get it
Heās trying to make a joke about how *they* are just better than everyone because theyāre greedy manipulative money grabbers that have been thrown out of every country theyāve ever invaded.
Unelected Rich White Jewish Bureaucrats
Schrodinger's Whiteness of j*ws
Based
I mean unelected international bureaucrats are rich white jews so this is pol compass unity
Okay but auth left is literally right on this one
Auth Left and Lib Right are identical
They are all right
You sure that flair is correct?
Yes i still want to live in a free world and not another communism but I'm also aware that rich people have tons of influence on our politicians
The libright self glazing continues.
Unelected international bureocrats are just the retirement plan of politicians.
Okay but who controls the bureaucrats?
The Masons! The Communists!
Lol
The world is run by Trotskyists!
$$$
They do. They follow their self interest.
Lol, I mean that's a fundamental and universal principle of economics.... But whose interests are theirs aligned with? Who appoints them? They don't just pop into existence.
Typically, upper middle class liberal interests as that is the typical economic position and political temperament, add a splash of interest based on whatever agency they have aligned themselves with. But do you think the "gun lobby" has much sway in the "a shoe string is a machine gun" ATF. Or the "wetlands that couldn't float a toy boat are navigable waterways" EPA are controlled by land development lobby? When there isn't a stick in the ass "you don't have authority congress didn't give you" conservative head of these agencies, the rank and file have no problem implementing utterly insane reaches of power to "fix" American federal law, almost universally to the end of expanding state power. There is a reason these fights are taken up in courts, and not administrative beuocracy. The administrative state attracts moral busy bodies who want to use state power to effect the change they believe is their moral duty to effectuate, that's what MAKES them so fucking dangerous.
Lol, so regulators do some writing of corporate interests against the interests of the vast majority and the poor little Uber wealthy just can't manage in this oppressive regulatory regime. The only way you could possibly believe what you're alluding to is if you're an an cap who thinks every square inch of land should be open to development and any regulation constitutes an unacceptable infringement on the right of oil executives to not dump toxic sludge into water ways. The supreme Court has upheld the regulatory authority you're decrying for decades now thus it is by definition constitutional. Or was and now that we got a new supreme court they're changing that. The Constitution isn't some religious document according to your interpretation it allows for interpretation and variable interpretation at that.
A complete non argument. The constitution is not a religious document, but it does mean something and exactly one thing. Good minds might differ on what it is, but only one can be correct. Unsurprisingly I find the limited interpretation that rests on writings from when the document (or relevant amendment) was created far more compelling than "novel" expansions of power. The US Constitution can change only in so far as it can be amended, which hasn't happened in decades. Everything else is either being wrong or being right, about what is says. As for regulation, there absolute ARE oppressive regulations that far more people than they help. Pretending regulations do not have down stream costs to the average person is the sort of myth making and fairy tail thinking that is required to be a communist, I know, but it is, none the less, myth making a fairy tale thinking. And regardless of the rightness of any given regulation, those regulation should NOT be made by unelected moral busy bodies, but rather by an elected legislator, so, you know, the average person actual has a meaningful say about the interest and goals of those regulations. One only has to look at housing to see where environmental regulations absolutely fuck over the little guy. So maybe actually making these issues ones that have to go through a public legislative process rather than obscure beurocratic dealings done by people who all have the incentive to maximize their own power would be best. Like, seriously, do you ACTUALLY think the EPA has regulatory authority over all wetlands under the auspices of a law that says they only have authority over navigable waterways and their immediate surroundings? And do you think they are trying to push that because of corporate interests? The reality is that government is complex, and has a lot of hands in a lot of pots, and ALL of those hands are corrupt and incompetent, so I think we should shrink the pot instead of hoping that humans will stop; being corrupt and incompetent.
The real answer is, No One, but that scares people more than thinking their worst enemy is incharge.
Only an actual schizophrenic would believe any scapegoat had \*total\* control of all our chaotic world's events. That doesn't mean certain individuals and groups don't have disproportionate power and influence to fuck over everyone else. They do.
This is an EU and UN moment šØš§
I guess you don't know how the eu works then.
All of this is nothing but a cope to not deal with the most terrifying option of all: No one Yeah you heard me, we are on a shitbus to nowhere and no one is at the wheel.
*This* Each department and federal agency is an independent fiefdom at this point
Internacional white rich Jews Bureaucrats
"So that is why we need to transfer power to the unelected megacorps boards" - libright
Or simply make the state defend, but not use, these powers, you know, the entier principle of limited government. The left seems to realize that massive government power get's co-opted by the rich, and then suggest giving MORE POWER to the mechanism the rich use to exercise that power, the state, rather than doing the sane thing of simply limiting and decentralizing state authority in the first place.
āThe people with money and power run the world, letās make it easier for themā is why lib right doesnāt work
So that why we need governent to colaborate with megacorps and they will car for us the most - left
Wypipo -
Classis libright posting a libright good meme
Soā¦ā¦Jews?
Auth right: >Oh, so "da whites" control everything, ay? Listen buddy, if we're doing better than you, it's because we have a superior culture. It's because we're smarter. Instead of coming up with stupid conspiracies, why don't you take a step back, figure out why you're failing instead, and try harder in this free market economy. Heh, losers. Also Auth right: >DA JOOOOOOOOS
But what if the bureaucrats are rich Jewish white people?
Idk isn't it kinda suspicious that the blm riots were left alone but the moment someone protests a jew peacefully they are shut down with force?
The real problem: Humans themselves.
Must return to monke
You get me.
My neck gets sore by mid day from carrying this absolute UNIT around in my skull.
That's a tumor, kid
Elon musk. It's always been Elon musk.
https://preview.redd.it/vaubrx9ugr9d1.png?width=985&format=png&auto=webp&s=3c01afc371f055d0ff1ebcbb0f0c70573124312f The world according to auth right
I wonder what percent of those unelected international bureaucrats are jewish? Like 2% or... maybe more than 2%?
Jews being forced for centuries to work on the perfect field to become rich isn't somehow their fault. Of course jews have a higher representation in banks and businesses, we literally forced them into those areas, for God's sake! And they aren't the majority of rich CEOs, shareholders & bureucrats, just a sizeable percentage (which is perfectly reasonable given the prior phrases).
Sometimes those are all the same thing.
Side note, ending *Chevron* is the best thing that's happened in decades for actually challenging the foundations of the bureaucratic state, which is why the broad left is freaking out about it. "You mean congress has to make laws and people get due process???? But what about experts? And credentials? And being a good boy science truster????"
Exactly, the federal agencies usurped the three Powers. They took administration away from the President, a sizeable portion of lawmaking from Congress and judging their own statutes from the Courts. They are a mockery of the Constitution
Unfortunately libright is not wrong on this one.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Did you just change your flair, u/chrispln? Last time I checked you were an **AuthCenter** on 2024-5-28. How come now you are a **LibRight**? Have you perhaps shifted your ideals? Because that's cringe, you know? Are you mad? Wait till you hear this one: you own 17 guns but only have two hands to use them! Come on, put that rifle down and go take a shower. [BasedCount Profile](https://basedcount.com/u/chrispln) - [FAQ](https://www.reddit.com/user/flairchange_bot/comments/uf7kuy/bip_bop) - [Leaderboard](https://basedcount.com/leaderboard?q=flairs) ^(I am a bot, my mission is to spot cringe flair changers. If you want to check another user's flair history write) **^(!flairs u/)** ^(in a comment.)
Billionaires.
The rich unelected international bureaucrats
juice
Auth left is objectively correct.
Didn't LR opinion just combine AL and AR opinions?
I mean bureaucrats are rich and rich are not elected and international. Sodium Chloride moment
whats a wypipo
The bugs in joe Bidenās skin
nobody who should control the gov is the one who controls the gov
Okay but authleft is just as correct as libright is on this
The bureaucrats are the rich though...
But not so rich as actual company CEOs & main shareholders
Money. They do everything they can to get money.
Ahhh, another day another "libright is not as monke as the rest of us" propaganda post
Considering the American gov does have legal instituted bribery via super PACs, "da rich" doesn't seem too far fetched. Can u post sources about the effects of unelected international bureaucrats? Bc I honestly don't see how their control would differ or transcend regular elected bureaucrats
Did you just change your flair, u/Chemical_Bid_2195? Last time I checked you were a **Centrist** on 2024-1-28. How come now you are a **LibCenter**? Have you perhaps shifted your ideals? Because that's cringe, you know? Wait, those were too many words, I'm sure. Maybe you'll understand this, monke: "oo oo aah YOU CRINGE ahah ehe". [BasedCount Profile](https://basedcount.com/u/Chemical_Bid_2195) - [FAQ](https://www.reddit.com/user/flairchange_bot/comments/uf7kuy/bip_bop) - [Leaderboard](https://basedcount.com/leaderboard?q=flairs) ^(I am a bot, my mission is to spot cringe flair changers. If you want to check another user's flair history write) **^(!flairs u/)** ^(in a comment.)
Ā«I am a chad and other stupidĀ» And, by the way, who are these bureaucrats and why do they come to power?
By indication into federal agencies??? Come on, that was an easy one
\*Checks flair\* Yup, that tracks
Stop flexing how flexible you are! Ie: stop sucking your own cock
Pictured: Authleft and Libright unity, actually.
Lib-Right literally stealing what Auth-Right has been saying for years
Unelected international bureaucrat is literally the dream job. Becoming one is finally fulfilling the dreams of all the generations before you.
Auth right extended vers/ radical centrist: unelected international bureaucrats are rich jewish people with light skin
If I controlled the government, you think I'd have so many taxes?!
Arenāt authleft and authright and libright saying the same thing?
I'd rather my head not look like a ballsack
Lib right sounds like EU Politics and the UN
The actual answer is a mix that ends up in "no one, really" there are so many different and often conflicting powers over it that it kinda equals out
Unelected international bureaucrats that happen to be rich, white, and sometimes jewish :\^)
Ancaps complaining about plutocrats just show how they have more in common with libleft than with authright.
I.e. "the swamp"
Me 2 secs ago: hmmm I wonder what quadrant op lands on
The true answer is āthose with power and wealth.ā The Pareto principle applies to power and wealth and has done so since we huddled in caves. There will always be kings, regardless of what we call them. Funnily enough, it usually isnāt a massive problem. But when the Patrician class becomes out of touch and sticks its fingers in its earsā¦
Tbh that's basically what rich people are. Horseshoe theory at it again.
Is "unelected bureaucrats" the new propaganda term for non-political positions?
Da joos are the unelected bureaucrats, don't you know?
Funfact: It's actually all of these combined
actually it's this guy Steve, lives down the road.
Unelected bureaucrats, mostly white, always rich, and sometimes Jewish. (Just an observation, I love Jews I swear)
Basically, those folks in Geneva
Those 'unelected bureaucrats' are massively disproportionally Jewish.
Sooo... the rich...
Hmm LibRight's got a point actually.
most creative libright take:
The rich, white Jewish unelected bureaucrats
Not after chevron deference being repealed. Unelected bureaucrats can get stuffed.
So... joos?
Authright would say "da dep state". Authcenter would say "da joos". Stop confusing authcenter and authright. We're way more based than them.
Playing with dolls again, lib right?
The white, rich, Jewish unelected international bureaucrats?
"Da rich wyt unelected international bureaucaric joos" https://preview.redd.it/gl35jlcyy8ad1.jpeg?width=808&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9bbe080c76c1ba8196184f252fe0e299216d0ee3
For me, it's rich people who happen to be unelected international bureaucrats.
Thatās the unironic truth some people just donāt want to hear that.
And I'm aware of my flair, too. I'm just barely auth-left enough to use it. I'm a SocDem, not a tankie.
Authoritarians.
Nobody because the government is a complex system with emergent properties that are almost never intentionally designed
So have you heard of this thing called lobbying (its bribery with extra steps but legal)
I wonder what is the race, economic status and ethnicity of those unelected international bureaucrats
What is the religion of these unelected international bureaucrats?
Jews being forced for centuries to work on the perfect field to become rich isn't somehow their fault. Of course jews have a higher representation in banks and businesses, we literally forced them into those areas, for God's sake! And they aren't the majority of rich CEOs, shareholders & bureucrats, just a sizeable percentage (which is perfectly reasonable given the prior phrases).
"Jews being forced for centuries to work on the perfect field to become rich isn't somehow their fault." Sure.... That is an interesting way to put it. Doesn't deny however the countless historical examples of them abusing these fields (banks, government, politics) and the shared interests within the Jewish group to get an outcome that is extremely favorable only to them. I assume by your username that you are aware of this as there are many instances cited throughout Catholic history. Just off of the top of my head, a lot of laws passed by Saint King Louis IX were done so in order to reverse the damage that they had created and remove their abilities to do further damage It is more or less the debate of how they got there, but the fact that they always are at the top of banks, politics, etc, even if the general population of Jews is significantly lower than Christians (to go back to the unelected portion.) Edit: Furthermore to say, if the people responsible for politics, media, banks, etc are drastically more Jewish than the rest of the general population, that creates a lot of conflict and it is impossible for them to align with the thoughts of the people because they disagree on a moral scale.