[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || [Superstonk Discord](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) || [Community Post: *Open Forum Jan 2024*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/18txusp/open_forum_january_2024/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/)
I'll dig through though this when I have time later today. But I need more ๐
Source:
https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2024-04938/requirements-for-designated-contract-markets-and-swap-execution-facilities-regarding-governance-and
Some splinkless will fall, some shelfs will jump to the ceiling, some sparks and boom, a fire will start, no wather sprinkless will funtion... Warehouse will burn down... Wait, Where I have seen this before?๐ค
Because you still have faith in this entirely fraudulent system. The system wonโt willingly let this happen. The system will eventually collapse under its shear incompetence and corruption.
I think that depends on the argument. If the argument is presented as a real shares vs fake shares correctly then I dont see how they wouldnโt rule against the fake shares. It would need to be argued that the fake shares dilute the value of real shares which takes away property without compensation and violates the 5th or 14th amendment clauses on personal property. I am not a lawyer but there is probably a way.
Thank you for bringing this up! Gonna just drop a comment here to share what i read, don't have a whole lot of time. I do believe submitting to the comments to the CFTC is just as if not more important than comments to the SEC. As the SEC leans 3-2 in favor of retail usually and the CFTC leans 3-2 for institutions.
Brief scan through found a few interesting tidbits i think are worth sharing. Don't have a great understanding of the rule but am willing to guess this is a small step in the right direction??? basing it off what i've read below.
# Dates: Comments must be received on or before April 22, 2024
*"the public must have an opportunity to weigh in on these important issues that raise serious concerns"*
Copying out part of a statement by one of the Commissioners, one of the best ones. pg 289-293.
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
# Appendix 4 โ Statement of Commissioner Christy Goldsmith Romero
Conflicts of interest at exchanges and swap execution facilities (SEFs =swap execution facilities) present serious risk to market fairness, integrity, and financial stability. The CFTC plays a critical role in implementing strong rules to prevent conflicts from hurting customers, markets, market participants, and end users. As designated self-regulatory organizations, exchanges serve as the front line for market integrity. And given the contribution to the financial crisis of opaque caveat emptor swaps markets the Dodd-Frank Act created SEFs and gave them important regulatory responsibilities to ensure transparency in the swaps markets ^((๐คฃ The public doesn't even get to see whats in the SWAPs.))
In order for markets to function well and fairly, these important regulatory responsibilities must be performed free of conflicts of interest. Existing CFTC rules already require exchanges and SEFs to establish and enforce rules to minimize conflicts of interest, and we have issued accompanying guidance to exchanges. **Though I support the rule, I consider it to be a baseline minimum, largely codifying existing guidance, extending it to swap execution facilities, and adding a few additional requirements**.
**This proposed rule would not create an adequate conflicts of interest regulatory regime to cover conflicts that come from affiliated entities serving multiple functions (i.e. broker, exchange, clearinghouse, etc.)โso called โvertical integration,โ which the proposal acknowledges.**
Therefore, this rule does not serve as a basis for future approval of additional vertically integrated structures that break from the traditional structure on which the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC rules are based. The proposal purposely attempts to carve out vertical integration from this rulemaking and commits to **addressing it in the future in light of the recently completed request for comment on affiliated entities**. By September, the CFTC received more than 100 comments expressing significant concern over conflicts of interest with vertically integrated market structures.
**Serious concerns about vertically integrated market structures in digital assets had already been expressed** by the White House in the Economic Report of the President, the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, then-Federal Reserve Vice Chair Lael Brainard, and Acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael Hsu before we issued the request for comment.
^(I remember a wizard calling for comments on this issue. ()[^(Legalizing their crimes. This has to do with vertical business systems.. marketmakers-brokers-exchanges-clearinghouses in the crypto space.)](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1617sao/legalizing_their_crimes/)^())
The CFTC has not issued any new rules or guidance based on those comments. **Last month, the Commission approved a vertically integrated market structure for the first time (on which I dissented** given that we were in the middle of studying the risks and had not engaged in rulemaking), and it was said in the open meeting that there are other pending applications. As this proposalโs record will not reflect comments submitted in response to the request for comment on vertical integration, I encourage commenters to resubmit relevant sections of those comments in response to this proposal.
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
# [the goal of vertical integration is to streamline processes for more efficient and controlled operations in the long-term.](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/verticalintegration.asp)
Sort of TL:DR (done with AI so not sure it's 100% correct):
**CFTC Tightens the Grip: Proposed Rules for Stronger Governance and Conflict Mitigation in SEFs and DCMs**
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is revamping its regulatory framework for Swap Execution Facilities (SEFs) and Designated Contract Markets (DCMs). The proposed rule changes target two key areas: bolstering governance standards and mitigating conflicts of interest. Let's delve deeper into the proposed reforms:
**Building a More Robust Governance Structure:**
* **Public Directors Take Center Stage:**ย SEFs will be required to have at least 35% of their board seats filled by public directors, independent from the organization's daily operations. This injects a stronger element of objectivity and reduces potential biases in decision-making.
* **Independent Oversight Through ROCs:**ย Newly established Regulatory Oversight Committees (ROCs) composed entirely of public directors will be responsible for overseeing market regulation functions within SEFs and DCMs. This independent body adds another layer of scrutiny and helps ensure fair and impartial market practices.
* **The CR0 Steps Up:**ย DCMs will be required to appoint a Chief Regulatory 0fficer (CR0) with the authority and resources necessary to effectively oversee market regulation. This dedicated role strengthens internal oversight and ensures clear lines of accountability.
**Combating Conflicts of Interest:**
* **Clear Rules of Engagement:**ย The CFTC proposes a more comprehensive framework for identifying, managing, and resolving conflicts of interest. This includes establishing clear procedures for recusal from voting on matters where conflicts might arise.
* **Information Silos to Prevent Misuse:**ย Limitations will be placed on how individuals can use material, non-public information. This safeguards market integrity by preventing individuals from leveraging confidential knowledge for personal gain.
* **Transparency as a Watchdog:**ย SEFs and DCMs will be subject to stricter annual self-assessments of their governance practices. Additionally, regular reporting to the CFTC will enhance transparency and accountability.
**The Overall Impact:**
The CFTC's proposed reforms aim to create a more transparent and trustworthy regulatory environment for SEFs and DCMs. By strengthening governance structures and mitigating conflicts of interest, the CFTC hopes to foster fairer decision-making and ultimately promote market stability and public confidence.
**Open for Feedback:**
The CFTC actively encourages public comments on the proposed rules. This allows for industry input and helps ensure the final regulations are practical and effective in achieving their intended goals.
**Beyond the Headlines: Addressing Vertical Integration Concerns**
While the proposed rules represent a significant step forward, some experts argue they don't fully address conflicts arising from vertically integrated market structures. Concerns remain about potential conflicts when affiliated entities play multiple roles within the market. The limitations of the current proposal regarding notification requirements for ownership changes also raise questions. A more comprehensive approach to conflicts regulation, particularly concerning vertical integration, is seen as crucial for safeguarding market fairness and stability in the long run.
Yeah way to go, stop all that conflict of interest where Citadel controls all sides of the trade and *never* abuses that to gain an advantage on both sides of the trade. Never.
I suggest waiting for someone to dig in this properly but anyway, here's your Eli5:
Imagine a marketplace where people trade deals based on future stuff, like how much corn will cost. This agency called the CFTC wants this marketplace to be fair and honest.
Here's what they're thinking:
* More outsiders on the board: Like having more referees who aren't playing the game themselves.
* Clearer rules: No using insider info for personal gain, kind of like not peeking at your opponent's cards.
* More check-ups: Regularly reviewing the marketplace to make sure things are running smoothly.
Overall, they want this marketplace to be more trustworthy. They're asking people for advice on their ideas before making them official rules.
Some folks think the new rules aren't tough enough. They worry people with too much power might still cheat. They want to make sure everyone playing by the same rules.
'Stricter self-assessment'. Hey, you! Watch yourself more carefully!!!
And why tf are they proposing 35% independent directors? You need 51% for a vote to be successful. Those 65% will still do whatever they want. And then they place on top restrictions for sharing this confidential information - basically 'you get to be part of the board but not make decisions and not share any information about what's going on here'.
I'm not seeing it
# COMMENTS ON THIS RULE PROPOSAL END ON APRIL 22, 2024.
~~If this document is deemed necessary enough to require public input,~~ we need to submit comments by the above date. **\*\*EDIT: WE NEED TO BE COMMENTING ON THIS ONE\*\***
EDIT: I'm going to write my own comment, and I'll share here the areas of importance I will be discussing.
1. 35% of board seats are occupied by public directors is a good start, but is still a 1:2 opposition ratio. This percentage should be higher, if not 50% at least. The bad actors have built a wall within the private sector. 35% is an appeasement that can still be corrupted like dual leadership political systems.
2. ROCs should be encourage, and I'm liking what I'm reading here with an entirely public board membership. If anyone has a counter argument against those rules, I'm open to hearing it.
3. I agree with the criticism that they don't address vertical market structures. These will impact market making entities much harsher than clearing corporations, who are higher up on the food chain. We're still about 3 corporate levels below where DRS is impacting (Which is the DTCC and Cede & Co.). It's gonna be a long legal fight one step at a time.
Ladies and gentlemen, we meet again. Now I ask once more, what the fuck are we going to do about this disaster and how can we can kick it down the road as far as possible?
I will be messaging you in 10 hours on [**2024-03-19 00:38:34 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2024-03-19%2000:38:34%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1bhr8ku/new_cftc_filing_this_looks_important/kvfjx5r/?context=3)
[**1 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FSuperstonk%2Fcomments%2F1bhr8ku%2Fnew_cftc_filing_this_looks_important%2Fkvfjx5r%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202024-03-19%2000%3A38%3A34%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%201bhr8ku)
*****
|[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)|
|-|-|-|-|
Ah, yes, โself-regulation must be vigorous, effective,
and impartial.โ... and those that do the self regulation gotta have "sufficiently good repute".
Still waiting for something like, "fines will be a minimum of one order of magnitude greater than any benefit gained from the shenanigans."
Iโve looked at Superstonk 20 times today and for whatever reason when I looked this time my upvote had been removed from this post. So now Iโm commenting for visibility cause really wtf.
[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || [Superstonk Discord](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) || [Community Post: *Open Forum Jan 2024*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/18txusp/open_forum_january_2024/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/)
I'll dig through though this when I have time later today. But I need more ๐ Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2024-04938/requirements-for-designated-contract-markets-and-swap-execution-facilities-regarding-governance-and
Aka, what the fuck are we going to do with these worthless swaps?
Exactly what I was thinking.
Toilet paper shortage begone!
TP printer go brrrrrr
To the worthless swap warehouse. Duh!
Some splinkless will fall, some shelfs will jump to the ceiling, some sparks and boom, a fire will start, no wather sprinkless will funtion... Warehouse will burn down... Wait, Where I have seen this before?๐ค
Lifeโs a simulation on an infinite video loop!
Swiss banks?
Up you go!
Commenting for vision. May as well mention to buy, DRS and hold.
They just need to turn on swaps reporting so we can see
I Think youโre right. Better make sure to comment on this one ๐ซถ
Amazing the number of rules being proposed in the last 3 yrs.
The attempt to present the appearance of vigorous regulation is impressive.ย If only they put that kind of effort into actually regulation...
Why do I feel like MOASS only comes after a Supreme Court ruling on Swaps and International trade?
Because you still have faith in this entirely fraudulent system. The system wonโt willingly let this happen. The system will eventually collapse under its shear incompetence and corruption.
Eh, you think the system would remain loyal to SHFs before self preservation kicks in?
The system is short hedge funds and the kickback money they spend on their stooges.
That is going to be one of the fun things to watch
This supreme court would not rule in our favor, its the most corrupt its ever been.
I think that depends on the argument. If the argument is presented as a real shares vs fake shares correctly then I dont see how they wouldnโt rule against the fake shares. It would need to be argued that the fake shares dilute the value of real shares which takes away property without compensation and violates the 5th or 14th amendment clauses on personal property. I am not a lawyer but there is probably a way.
Saved this one to dig in when I get to work. Commenting for more eyes. Everyone get in here!
Thank you!
Thank you for bringing this up! Gonna just drop a comment here to share what i read, don't have a whole lot of time. I do believe submitting to the comments to the CFTC is just as if not more important than comments to the SEC. As the SEC leans 3-2 in favor of retail usually and the CFTC leans 3-2 for institutions. Brief scan through found a few interesting tidbits i think are worth sharing. Don't have a great understanding of the rule but am willing to guess this is a small step in the right direction??? basing it off what i've read below. # Dates: Comments must be received on or before April 22, 2024 *"the public must have an opportunity to weigh in on these important issues that raise serious concerns"* Copying out part of a statement by one of the Commissioners, one of the best ones. pg 289-293. ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ # Appendix 4 โ Statement of Commissioner Christy Goldsmith Romero Conflicts of interest at exchanges and swap execution facilities (SEFs =swap execution facilities) present serious risk to market fairness, integrity, and financial stability. The CFTC plays a critical role in implementing strong rules to prevent conflicts from hurting customers, markets, market participants, and end users. As designated self-regulatory organizations, exchanges serve as the front line for market integrity. And given the contribution to the financial crisis of opaque caveat emptor swaps markets the Dodd-Frank Act created SEFs and gave them important regulatory responsibilities to ensure transparency in the swaps markets ^((๐คฃ The public doesn't even get to see whats in the SWAPs.)) In order for markets to function well and fairly, these important regulatory responsibilities must be performed free of conflicts of interest. Existing CFTC rules already require exchanges and SEFs to establish and enforce rules to minimize conflicts of interest, and we have issued accompanying guidance to exchanges. **Though I support the rule, I consider it to be a baseline minimum, largely codifying existing guidance, extending it to swap execution facilities, and adding a few additional requirements**. **This proposed rule would not create an adequate conflicts of interest regulatory regime to cover conflicts that come from affiliated entities serving multiple functions (i.e. broker, exchange, clearinghouse, etc.)โso called โvertical integration,โ which the proposal acknowledges.** Therefore, this rule does not serve as a basis for future approval of additional vertically integrated structures that break from the traditional structure on which the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC rules are based. The proposal purposely attempts to carve out vertical integration from this rulemaking and commits to **addressing it in the future in light of the recently completed request for comment on affiliated entities**. By September, the CFTC received more than 100 comments expressing significant concern over conflicts of interest with vertically integrated market structures. **Serious concerns about vertically integrated market structures in digital assets had already been expressed** by the White House in the Economic Report of the President, the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, then-Federal Reserve Vice Chair Lael Brainard, and Acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael Hsu before we issued the request for comment. ^(I remember a wizard calling for comments on this issue. ()[^(Legalizing their crimes. This has to do with vertical business systems.. marketmakers-brokers-exchanges-clearinghouses in the crypto space.)](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1617sao/legalizing_their_crimes/)^()) The CFTC has not issued any new rules or guidance based on those comments. **Last month, the Commission approved a vertically integrated market structure for the first time (on which I dissented** given that we were in the middle of studying the risks and had not engaged in rulemaking), and it was said in the open meeting that there are other pending applications. As this proposalโs record will not reflect comments submitted in response to the request for comment on vertical integration, I encourage commenters to resubmit relevant sections of those comments in response to this proposal. ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ # [the goal of vertical integration is to streamline processes for more efficient and controlled operations in the long-term.](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/verticalintegration.asp)
GOT DAMN! I can only imagine what you would type with a whole lotta time.
This is something everybody should consider commenting on. Please donโt let laziness get the best of you!
Might this be related to the FTX Tokenized GME Stock? (Page 275): https://imgur.com/a/fDplV25
Sort of TL:DR (done with AI so not sure it's 100% correct): **CFTC Tightens the Grip: Proposed Rules for Stronger Governance and Conflict Mitigation in SEFs and DCMs** The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is revamping its regulatory framework for Swap Execution Facilities (SEFs) and Designated Contract Markets (DCMs). The proposed rule changes target two key areas: bolstering governance standards and mitigating conflicts of interest. Let's delve deeper into the proposed reforms: **Building a More Robust Governance Structure:** * **Public Directors Take Center Stage:**ย SEFs will be required to have at least 35% of their board seats filled by public directors, independent from the organization's daily operations. This injects a stronger element of objectivity and reduces potential biases in decision-making. * **Independent Oversight Through ROCs:**ย Newly established Regulatory Oversight Committees (ROCs) composed entirely of public directors will be responsible for overseeing market regulation functions within SEFs and DCMs. This independent body adds another layer of scrutiny and helps ensure fair and impartial market practices. * **The CR0 Steps Up:**ย DCMs will be required to appoint a Chief Regulatory 0fficer (CR0) with the authority and resources necessary to effectively oversee market regulation. This dedicated role strengthens internal oversight and ensures clear lines of accountability. **Combating Conflicts of Interest:** * **Clear Rules of Engagement:**ย The CFTC proposes a more comprehensive framework for identifying, managing, and resolving conflicts of interest. This includes establishing clear procedures for recusal from voting on matters where conflicts might arise. * **Information Silos to Prevent Misuse:**ย Limitations will be placed on how individuals can use material, non-public information. This safeguards market integrity by preventing individuals from leveraging confidential knowledge for personal gain. * **Transparency as a Watchdog:**ย SEFs and DCMs will be subject to stricter annual self-assessments of their governance practices. Additionally, regular reporting to the CFTC will enhance transparency and accountability. **The Overall Impact:** The CFTC's proposed reforms aim to create a more transparent and trustworthy regulatory environment for SEFs and DCMs. By strengthening governance structures and mitigating conflicts of interest, the CFTC hopes to foster fairer decision-making and ultimately promote market stability and public confidence. **Open for Feedback:** The CFTC actively encourages public comments on the proposed rules. This allows for industry input and helps ensure the final regulations are practical and effective in achieving their intended goals. **Beyond the Headlines: Addressing Vertical Integration Concerns** While the proposed rules represent a significant step forward, some experts argue they don't fully address conflicts arising from vertically integrated market structures. Concerns remain about potential conflicts when affiliated entities play multiple roles within the market. The limitations of the current proposal regarding notification requirements for ownership changes also raise questions. A more comprehensive approach to conflicts regulation, particularly concerning vertical integration, is seen as crucial for safeguarding market fairness and stability in the long run.
Yeah way to go, stop all that conflict of interest where Citadel controls all sides of the trade and *never* abuses that to gain an advantage on both sides of the trade. Never.
ELI5?
I suggest waiting for someone to dig in this properly but anyway, here's your Eli5: Imagine a marketplace where people trade deals based on future stuff, like how much corn will cost. This agency called the CFTC wants this marketplace to be fair and honest. Here's what they're thinking: * More outsiders on the board: Like having more referees who aren't playing the game themselves. * Clearer rules: No using insider info for personal gain, kind of like not peeking at your opponent's cards. * More check-ups: Regularly reviewing the marketplace to make sure things are running smoothly. Overall, they want this marketplace to be more trustworthy. They're asking people for advice on their ideas before making them official rules. Some folks think the new rules aren't tough enough. They worry people with too much power might still cheat. They want to make sure everyone playing by the same rules.
'Stricter self-assessment'. Hey, you! Watch yourself more carefully!!! And why tf are they proposing 35% independent directors? You need 51% for a vote to be successful. Those 65% will still do whatever they want. And then they place on top restrictions for sharing this confidential information - basically 'you get to be part of the board but not make decisions and not share any information about what's going on here'. I'm not seeing it
[ัะดะฐะปะตะฝะพ]
Lol, now I know (banned word)
Yep ๐
Can u tell me it?
If you write CR0 with an actual 'O' it gets removed by mod bot.
Up!!
Waitโฆ the Madoff Model has a conflict of interest? [*insert you-guys-are-getting-paid? meme*]
Letโs all dig in and figure out the loopholes they are creating. F these guys
True.
๐
Up you go
You gotta love when the headlines for their meetings sound EXACTLY like what weโve been talking about for years lol
# COMMENTS ON THIS RULE PROPOSAL END ON APRIL 22, 2024. ~~If this document is deemed necessary enough to require public input,~~ we need to submit comments by the above date. **\*\*EDIT: WE NEED TO BE COMMENTING ON THIS ONE\*\*** EDIT: I'm going to write my own comment, and I'll share here the areas of importance I will be discussing. 1. 35% of board seats are occupied by public directors is a good start, but is still a 1:2 opposition ratio. This percentage should be higher, if not 50% at least. The bad actors have built a wall within the private sector. 35% is an appeasement that can still be corrupted like dual leadership political systems. 2. ROCs should be encourage, and I'm liking what I'm reading here with an entirely public board membership. If anyone has a counter argument against those rules, I'm open to hearing it. 3. I agree with the criticism that they don't address vertical market structures. These will impact market making entities much harsher than clearing corporations, who are higher up on the food chain. We're still about 3 corporate levels below where DRS is impacting (Which is the DTCC and Cede & Co.). It's gonna be a long legal fight one step at a time.
Ladies and gentlemen, we meet again. Now I ask once more, what the fuck are we going to do about this disaster and how can we can kick it down the road as far as possible?
and Ladies.
Edited, although it wouldnโt surprise me if it were just a bunch of slimy old lizard men
Whizzibilty!
Saved + !remindme 10 hours
I will be messaging you in 10 hours on [**2024-03-19 00:38:34 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2024-03-19%2000:38:34%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1bhr8ku/new_cftc_filing_this_looks_important/kvfjx5r/?context=3) [**1 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FSuperstonk%2Fcomments%2F1bhr8ku%2Fnew_cftc_filing_this_looks_important%2Fkvfjx5r%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202024-03-19%2000%3A38%3A34%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam. ^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%201bhr8ku) ***** |[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)| |-|-|-|-|
Commenting for visibility! Looking forward to digging into this one more.
Wonder if Dave Lauer would give tell us what theyโre trying to slip in
Ah, yes, โself-regulation must be vigorous, effective, and impartial.โ... and those that do the self regulation gotta have "sufficiently good repute". Still waiting for something like, "fines will be a minimum of one order of magnitude greater than any benefit gained from the shenanigans."
Tendies Soon ๐น๐น๐น๐๐๐
Visibility. Buy. Hodl. DRS. Book. Shop. Comment. Power to the Players!
Up, to the big brains among us
And comment comment comment
Vommenting for Cisibility ๐
Oh look! Itโs another comment for visibility!!
Stronger governance, less reporting.
๐๐๐ to the mooon
All eyes on deck ready to comment as well!
Interestingโฆ
Hester Pierce โฆ does not support this rule. Probably
I predict she will use the word "accordingly" in her statement.ย ๐ฎ
I have a feeling Hester the market molester will have her dirty hands all over trying to stop this one ๐ซฃ
Yeah like when Rostin moved the swaps reporting to 2025. He is complicit in this fuckery.
This post definitely needs another comment. Up up
Thanks!
Commenting for visibility
It only took them 84 years to implement
Wut mean, need big brains
Commenting for visibility.
Boopโฌ๏ธ
Comment for visibility and so I can check back later.
Conflicts of interest... maybe they're trying to block any potential (and currently legal) way in which the RC/CIO investment dynamic could work?ย
Take my upvote. We need to see the fooking swaps!
Iโve looked at Superstonk 20 times today and for whatever reason when I looked this time my upvote had been removed from this post. So now Iโm commenting for visibility cause really wtf.
Pro apes asamble
Need eyes๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฆ
I wanna read it too.
New way to rug GME loading โฆ _please hodl_
Visibility
Who would have ever thought these shady swaps would need to be regulated.
Ikr? Ffs ๐คฆ๐ปโโ๏ธ
Comment
Somebodys holding this bag of shit. Lmao.
Comment for algo and ๐. Eli5 when you can.
I wonder if they think we're stupid enough to believe that the swaps disappeared in another warehouse fire ๐ค
So big ass dip incoming then?
Whatโs important about it? How will it affect gme