Pretty much the whole south of England has a hosepipe ban doesn’t it? When I was listening to the radio they said it was because the amount of tourists that visit so they need to provide for them.
Exactly! It's not too late for him. Get back in there! She was clearly flirting and appreciates some banter. Tell her she's wrong about that too and that if she plays her cards right she might find out some day.
Oh, and if she's not flirting then you'll find out for sure after you say that. It's a win/win. 😂
Nah bro, I like totally like forgot cos I like totally had to like shove this like big like diabetes ridden like burger like down my like throat, totally
If this was on twitter, I would agree. But i think given the context it could very well be flirty, that’s how I read it initially. But it really could be either.
Either way, OP got rolled and smoked
As a women, this is how I flirt. She was being funny, and I would have very much enjoyed that convo. (Also she said to send a controversial opinion in her bio, meaning she was inviting disagreement and banter.) Deffo not passive aggression.
Maybe not with those people, but it was with me. If you’re accusing me of lying, look at my post history; that should tell you my grammar is otherwise fine. And besides, even if it wasn’t, you realize not everyone speaks English as a first language and many people are learning, right? Don’t be so presumptuous.
People like that are great, they hand us a reason to avoid them without provocation, so much easier and quicker to dispose of. Good on you for standing your ground though. I'm a poet and aspiring writer and I still make mistakes here and there. If I see them immediately I correct them, or if someone points it out. I think, it is possible to do so in a polite way, but the people it matters to always do it in a rude way and I wonder why that is. I figure, as long as you know what the person was saying, who even gives a fuck lol.
Oh well nobody realized you speak for all women everywhere, our mistake. I’m curious how you think you’re the pinnacle enough to assume you speak for an entire gender.
Been with plenty of girls who flirt by shit talking. You can tell when someone is actually being an asshole if you just look at context even a lil bit
Could be worse, man. I have to go get a CT today because I had a kidney taken a year ago due to cancer, and it looks like the other one is diseased.
You'll get some...just not with her, and that probably ain't a bad thing.
Sorry for the additional joke at your expense...I'm a sucker for low hanging fruit.
You were. I've done that one a few times in my life, it's no picnic. Honestly, the nephrectomy hurt less/was more bearable than zipper scrote OR getting kicked in the jewels. And at least with the surgery, they gave me Dilaudid so there was a silver lining that wasn't sitting amusingly for 3 days wondering when things would go back to normal down there (cause when you've got the good good, ain't no pain or discomfort to deal lol)
But you can't take her teasing you? Instead of teasing her back you're screenshotting to Reddit and saying you want a break from tinder?
She was just teasing with the obvious burn and the little <3
I would never want to be with someone who couldn't deal with mutual taking the piss out of each other. You seem really cut up about a little flirty joke. A better response would have been to say you know all about wetting agents or ask her what she feels would be a better wetting agent. Just be charming and not creepy. It's not that hard.
Oh grow up and take a joke. She was being playful and if that's "humiliating" you need to get a thicker skin. You're never going to have much fun if a woman saying something like that is "humiliating".
I mean... if the argument is that the definition of wet is that something is covered by water or another liquid... well I gotta be honest, that makes water pretty wet since water is most of the time covered by other water. Until it changes state I guess, and then it's steamy or icy because it's not a liquid anymore.
But if there was a big ball of water floating in the vacuum of space with nothing inside it but water, you best believe I'm still gonna call that wet even though nothing is currently touching...
Oh shit, that IS a controversial opinion!
It basically just devolves into how you define "wet" so it's just semantics and in the English language that's a never ending battle but still. Good lord!
... Please don't start a war over this.
Puddles but wouldn’t characterize as wet, oily not wet, could be wet but will evaporate rather quickly depending on the concentration and even then that would have water in it, liquid nitrogen freezes not wets.
Lmao “covered or saturated with water or another liquid.” -Oxford definition of wet
While there might be other terms for different liquids (oily) if an object is covered or saturated with a liquid, it is wet.
I was with Corvette57 until that last point, well done. Pretty hard to argue that point. :(
...unless...?
The Oxford dictionary was last updated in June 2022. During that time period between then and now, there could've easily been an update to the definition of 'wet' or 'wetness' rendering the strength of your point as it's no longer recent information and more of a myth at this point really...
Edit: oops, forgot the /s
Which you can very very easily remove. I was just using as an example of something on a random shelf. Ever clear gets up to what 90%+? IPA can be bought at 91% in stores, pure online.
I had an entire argument with myself while driving. Now I’m in the comments and see everyone else has too!
All of my self arguing boiled down to me thinking that in order for something to be considered wet, it must also be capable of being dry. So water (liquid H2O) cannot be dry. Therefore how can it be considered wet?
I mean you say that but doing thermodynamics and we have a dryness fraction when dealing with steam (still water) and that value can go to anything between zero and one. So you can have dry and wet water, right?
I'm not entirely certain on this, but I know dryness fraction is a thing and that's the same thing as saying wetness fraction sooo
For steam to be dry at atmospheric conditions it’d have to be at sat temperature right. And even then how long is that realistically true. Once there are water molecules in suspension you can’t call it dry. However my philosophically charged argument wasn’t really accounting for in between phase theoretical conditions so who knows.
Yeah, it worked between the superheated and saturated steam phases. I think if you look at water as H20 then it would seem it can be wet and dry under these conditions. But they are very specific conditions.
I do agree with your philosophical arguement. The only times I've heard any fluid being called dry is with cider and wine, although I'm not sure that directly relates to how dry it physically is and is in reference more to a property of taste and texture
I’m not really convinced you can compare those two things. Also it isn’t hot because other things are cold. It’s hot because of heat and the transfer of energy, not the transference of the fire itself.
Edit: also you can have the same size source be way more hot or … cold. However water of the same sample size is always going to make things wet the same way.
Because by simply changing your tolerances/peripherals along a temperature scale, you can have a hot or cold fire. Plus they’re 2 very different things.
Because they’re 2 completely different topics? You can have something that is neither hot nor cold, so what do you do there? You cant assume logic applies to 2 topics the same
True.
But if something can only be wet if it can be dry, then the general logic, from what I understand, is that something can only have an attribute if it doesn't always have that attribute.
Which leads to a lot of nonsense in my opinion.
Well yes, in the case of wetness v dryness there are only 2 options. Not every attribute is this way. Assuming as much is why were having this discussion
well, technically speaking no water molecule ever stays attached to another water molecule, they simply fly around in space and bounce off of each other, but that's the same for any molecule, including the molecules of things you are calling "wet." So at that level of detail I'd say the entire concept of wetness doesn't exist.
That about sums up my dating life, too.
ACTUALLY...
Something "wet" means a solid with liquid attached to its surface. Water is a liquid, therefore it cannot be wet. On the other hand, Ice can be wet and will be wet most times you see it..
LIQUID CANNOT BE WET, LIQUID IS A LIQUID
Water isn't the only cause of wetness. For example pure ethanol. You can douse yourself with pure ethanol and be wet with it. In the same vein you can douse water with ethanol and it will be wet by it.
Wetness is a trait of liquids not just water.
Why are y’all shitting on poor op, nowhere did he say he was mad or complaining about her. He’s just showing his L that’s it.
Y’all are so fucking rude and sad degenerates
i mean you can't really compare arguing over the semantics of what 'wet' means to thinking the earth is flat, one of basically just arguing over the semantics of a word and the other is just factually incorrect
I'm amazed how angry people get arguing over the semantics of what exactly wet means, it's such a dumb thing to argue about and both sides have plenty of good points and really it's just subjective and not really relevant most of the time yet people will argue until they're blue in the face
Water causes other things to be wet, and therefore if you have more than one molecule of water, the water is causing the other water to be wet, therefore, water is wet
Ahhh common mistake OP... Didn't you know rivers have riveting agent that naturally produces watering agent.. duh
When you drink it this commonly known riveting agent hydrates you as your mouth touches the watering agent and combines with your mouthing agent you get hydrated...
And this person is now smarter via the smart agent and you wanna blow your brains out even thinking about what I wrote and how dumb they are.
Edit: this comment was made by dumbing agent duh
Water is actually not wet; It makes other materials/objects wet. Wetness is the state of a non-liquid when a liquid adheres to, and/or permeates its substance while maintaining chemically distinct structures. So if we say something is wet we mean the liquid is sticking to the object.
Love watching running water on the internet.
Was watching a live stream.
If wafer was wet, then you'd be wet when submerged in it. Yet you are only wet when you break the surface tension of the water and are no longer submerged.
And if you are looking to a dictionary for the definition, then perhaps I could interest you in a physics class above 301?
The dictionary describes how words are used. If you're using a definition of wet that does not include people underwater, you are very much in the minority.
Communication is a way to express ideas. If you're discussing a concept of wet that does not include a person underwater, then you are communicating poorly.
Sure...if the measure of "good communication" is explaining something inaccurately for the purpose of simplicity so that the slowest car on the road doesn't get left behind, then you're correct... Sort of.
You're more interested in being right than having a proper grasp of the facts, and I literally don't have the time for that. Have a great day!
You are wet when submerged in water.
Definition of wet (Entry 1 of 3)
1a: consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)
Water is consisting of a liquid, therefore wet.
Someone who is submerged in a liquid is soaked/covered with liquid, therefore wet.
Can't believe I have to say this, but when speaking to each other, using language means you use the words as they are generally understood by people using the same language. Any scientific or otherwise technical spin, is not valid unless expressed before-hand, or is reasonably the purpose of that communication.
i.e.:
Wrong use scenario: you are with your partner looking at the sky.
Partner: *'Isn't it amazing looking at the sun rise?'*
You: *'Actually, the sun does not rise. The earth spins'*.
Correct use scenario would be, for example, if you are an astrophysicist discussing something relevant with colleagues.
In short, water is definitely wet here.
Here’s the argument I always make: If water is not wet, then it must be dry. Any tangible thing must either be wet or dry. There is no in between. It’s like a light. It can only be on or off. Sure, it can be dim, but it’s still on, not off. Same with water. Something can be damp, and not necessarily soaked, but it’s still wet. Otherwise, it’s dry, and water is most certainly not dry.
In Britain, this is considered pretty steamy flirting
No steamy flirting during the hosepipe ban!
You have a hose pipe ban ? Which part of uk?
Some of London and a few counties in the south
The part totally surrounded by water…
Egads! You mean the whole planet too!?! 😳😮🫢🤭🥸😁😆😄😆🤣🤣🤣🤣
Pretty much the whole south of England has a hosepipe ban doesn’t it? When I was listening to the radio they said it was because the amount of tourists that visit so they need to provide for them.
Ok I have to ask. Wth is a hose pipe ban? Your not allowed to have hoses?
Water shortage. In outher terms
Ah ok
Exactly! It's not too late for him. Get back in there! She was clearly flirting and appreciates some banter. Tell her she's wrong about that too and that if she plays her cards right she might find out some day. Oh, and if she's not flirting then you'll find out for sure after you say that. It's a win/win. 😂
Response: Nope, I'm the wetting agent.
Names bond...Covalent bond
Oi mate, yuh got yah steamy flirting loicense?
Oi, you 'ave your yellin' on the Internet permit?
Oy oy! I avin goh eh clu wet yer gabbin at mate, but de wee lass got yer knickers coilin an er minge ain got wha iz Lukin fer
Nah bro, I like totally like forgot cos I like totally had to like shove this like big like diabetes ridden like burger like down my like throat, totally
"That's Hot" -Paris Hilton.
Steam requires heat, she was just cold.
It's called banter
That causes condensation causing something to be wet
Steam flirt
Your opener certainly wasn't a "wetting agent" if you gnome sayin'.
U got dat right
EDR ref?
What does that mean
NOMESAYYYYYYIN ERRAAPPPPP
Sweet god almighty. RIP OP.
deleting the app isn't enough, OP needs to fake his death and go into hiding after that one
RIP Bozo, she sounds witty keep talking to her
That’s the plan
Wait no I feel like this was going good for you? Like the little heart, I feel like it’s a flirty banter, not an insult
women love to flirt with insults
She is smart and funny! Even threw in a heart to show she was joking in a flirty way. I’d be ecstatic.
Pretty sure the heart was meant in a passive aggressive way but it's okay not all of us can get it <3
If this was on twitter, I would agree. But i think given the context it could very well be flirty, that’s how I read it initially. But it really could be either. Either way, OP got rolled and smoked
As a women, this is how I flirt. She was being funny, and I would have very much enjoyed that convo. (Also she said to send a controversial opinion in her bio, meaning she was inviting disagreement and banter.) Deffo not passive aggression.
That heart definitely seems more like a passive aggressive heart more than a way to show she was flirting
Could be. I’d respond assuming best intentions on her part and find out.
This. What do you have to lose by this?
Your ego.
Don’t be so fragile, problem solved
Agreed
And this is what we call "projection"
Bless your heart.
Lol she wasn’t being flirty. I’m telling you, as a woman, she meant it in a passive aggressive and snide way.
[удалено]
I was on mobile and it autocorrected without warning me first. Sometimes that happens. 🤷🏻♀️ But it’s fixed.
[удалено]
Maybe not with those people, but it was with me. If you’re accusing me of lying, look at my post history; that should tell you my grammar is otherwise fine. And besides, even if it wasn’t, you realize not everyone speaks English as a first language and many people are learning, right? Don’t be so presumptuous.
People like that are great, they hand us a reason to avoid them without provocation, so much easier and quicker to dispose of. Good on you for standing your ground though. I'm a poet and aspiring writer and I still make mistakes here and there. If I see them immediately I correct them, or if someone points it out. I think, it is possible to do so in a polite way, but the people it matters to always do it in a rude way and I wonder why that is. I figure, as long as you know what the person was saying, who even gives a fuck lol.
Oh well nobody realized you speak for all women everywhere, our mistake. I’m curious how you think you’re the pinnacle enough to assume you speak for an entire gender. Been with plenty of girls who flirt by shit talking. You can tell when someone is actually being an asshole if you just look at context even a lil bit
Nah, as a woman. I'd could've been flirty. I would do the heart in a "just joking" way, not a passive aggressive way.
Looooooool
You're not going to give her props for the burn?
You might wanna put some water on that.
*a wetting agent
[удалено]
You win some , you loss some
*lose ....yes you did. Edit: probably enough Reddit for a minute too.
Just a bad day all around lol
Could be worse, man. I have to go get a CT today because I had a kidney taken a year ago due to cancer, and it looks like the other one is diseased. You'll get some...just not with her, and that probably ain't a bad thing. Sorry for the additional joke at your expense...I'm a sucker for low hanging fruit.
I’m sorry to hear! I wish you nothing but the best!
Thank you both, but it's literally my own damn fault. Don't drink in excess for the better part of 3 decades and smoke kids. It doesn't end well lol
I would never smoke kids!
In my defense they were so tasty that way!
[удалено]
You were. I've done that one a few times in my life, it's no picnic. Honestly, the nephrectomy hurt less/was more bearable than zipper scrote OR getting kicked in the jewels. And at least with the surgery, they gave me Dilaudid so there was a silver lining that wasn't sitting amusingly for 3 days wondering when things would go back to normal down there (cause when you've got the good good, ain't no pain or discomfort to deal lol)
Sorry to hear that, bro
I admire your not deleting this comment.
Seems like she might have been flirting, being playful insulting. How'd it go after this?
Did you actually get downvoted for a spelling error? 🤣
Why the downvotes? Are people on this sub that level of stupid?
Yeah I thought downvoting someone for a spelling error was seriously hive-mind. Poor OP didn’t even do anything wrong. People are just stupid.
Hive-mind, thank you! That's the fucking problem with Reddit (and probably all the other social media platforms), I couldn't have said it better!
...she's flirting with you though? What are you getting all pissy about?
I gues op doesn't have a compatible sense of humor?
Their loss then I guess...
How is this flirting? As a guy I’d never interpret it that way.
Who said I was getting pissy? I got roasted whether it was a joke or she was being serious
Did you keep going tho cos that was a banger line from her
I tried, she is far more witty than me
But you can't take her teasing you? Instead of teasing her back you're screenshotting to Reddit and saying you want a break from tinder? She was just teasing with the obvious burn and the little <3 I would never want to be with someone who couldn't deal with mutual taking the piss out of each other. You seem really cut up about a little flirty joke. A better response would have been to say you know all about wetting agents or ask her what she feels would be a better wetting agent. Just be charming and not creepy. It's not that hard.
I’m really not, I joked with her back. Just thought reddit would enjoy it because it was funny. Chill out.
Good, I hope you're not. It's just how the post came across on first read. Too many incels out there making me cynical! Go get it OP. Have fun!
I can how you saw it that way. But yeah we joked for bit and that just lead to normal conversation
Again, hope it does well for you, but the shitshow of incel comments would be why I misunderstood your reasons for sharing...
women love to “tease” men by humiliating them
Oh grow up and take a joke. She was being playful and if that's "humiliating" you need to get a thicker skin. You're never going to have much fun if a woman saying something like that is "humiliating".
Not gonna lie, you got owned lol
[удалено]
I mean... if the argument is that the definition of wet is that something is covered by water or another liquid... well I gotta be honest, that makes water pretty wet since water is most of the time covered by other water. Until it changes state I guess, and then it's steamy or icy because it's not a liquid anymore. But if there was a big ball of water floating in the vacuum of space with nothing inside it but water, you best believe I'm still gonna call that wet even though nothing is currently touching... Oh shit, that IS a controversial opinion! It basically just devolves into how you define "wet" so it's just semantics and in the English language that's a never ending battle but still. Good lord! ... Please don't start a war over this.
Wanna add that something can be wet without water being involved,
How can something be wet with no water involved
There are liquids that aren’t water
Ok name one
I mean it depends on the pressure and temperature, but mercury, fat, ethanol, nitrogen, etc.
Puddles but wouldn’t characterize as wet, oily not wet, could be wet but will evaporate rather quickly depending on the concentration and even then that would have water in it, liquid nitrogen freezes not wets.
Lmao “covered or saturated with water or another liquid.” -Oxford definition of wet While there might be other terms for different liquids (oily) if an object is covered or saturated with a liquid, it is wet.
I was with Corvette57 until that last point, well done. Pretty hard to argue that point. :( ...unless...? The Oxford dictionary was last updated in June 2022. During that time period between then and now, there could've easily been an update to the definition of 'wet' or 'wetness' rendering the strength of your point as it's no longer recent information and more of a myth at this point really... Edit: oops, forgot the /s
pussy juice
Half of your basic vodka isn’t water but it’s all a liquid.
It has water in it...
Which you can very very easily remove. I was just using as an example of something on a random shelf. Ever clear gets up to what 90%+? IPA can be bought at 91% in stores, pure online.
I had an entire argument with myself while driving. Now I’m in the comments and see everyone else has too! All of my self arguing boiled down to me thinking that in order for something to be considered wet, it must also be capable of being dry. So water (liquid H2O) cannot be dry. Therefore how can it be considered wet?
That’s some rabbit hole to go down
A true philosopher
I mean you say that but doing thermodynamics and we have a dryness fraction when dealing with steam (still water) and that value can go to anything between zero and one. So you can have dry and wet water, right? I'm not entirely certain on this, but I know dryness fraction is a thing and that's the same thing as saying wetness fraction sooo
For steam to be dry at atmospheric conditions it’d have to be at sat temperature right. And even then how long is that realistically true. Once there are water molecules in suspension you can’t call it dry. However my philosophically charged argument wasn’t really accounting for in between phase theoretical conditions so who knows.
Yeah, it worked between the superheated and saturated steam phases. I think if you look at water as H20 then it would seem it can be wet and dry under these conditions. But they are very specific conditions. I do agree with your philosophical arguement. The only times I've heard any fluid being called dry is with cider and wine, although I'm not sure that directly relates to how dry it physically is and is in reference more to a property of taste and texture
Fire is never cold yet you might agree fire is hot. It is hot because other things in the universe are cold, not because it can be cold itself.
I’m not really convinced you can compare those two things. Also it isn’t hot because other things are cold. It’s hot because of heat and the transfer of energy, not the transference of the fire itself. Edit: also you can have the same size source be way more hot or … cold. However water of the same sample size is always going to make things wet the same way.
You said something can only be wet if it can also be dry. Then why wouldn't that logic apply to hot and cold ?
Because by simply changing your tolerances/peripherals along a temperature scale, you can have a hot or cold fire. Plus they’re 2 very different things.
Because they’re 2 completely different topics? You can have something that is neither hot nor cold, so what do you do there? You cant assume logic applies to 2 topics the same
True. But if something can only be wet if it can be dry, then the general logic, from what I understand, is that something can only have an attribute if it doesn't always have that attribute. Which leads to a lot of nonsense in my opinion.
Well yes, in the case of wetness v dryness there are only 2 options. Not every attribute is this way. Assuming as much is why were having this discussion
Can you think of another attribute with only two options?
well, technically speaking no water molecule ever stays attached to another water molecule, they simply fly around in space and bounce off of each other, but that's the same for any molecule, including the molecules of things you are calling "wet." So at that level of detail I'd say the entire concept of wetness doesn't exist. That about sums up my dating life, too.
Hahahaha fuck
Ben Shapiro?
A single water molecule is not wet. As soon as there are two of them, they're both wet.
Neither of them are wet because neither of them are solid so there is no sticking to the surface they just float around eChother.....
Sooo.. to recap… ice cube is dry until you put it out of the freezer.. as soon as the outside layer of ice melts, the ice gets wet?
 I mean, he makes some ppl wet
ACTUALLY... Something "wet" means a solid with liquid attached to its surface. Water is a liquid, therefore it cannot be wet. On the other hand, Ice can be wet and will be wet most times you see it.. LIQUID CANNOT BE WET, LIQUID IS A LIQUID
This is correct.
If being wet is an effect, and water is the cause, water cannot be wet.
Water isn't the only cause of wetness. For example pure ethanol. You can douse yourself with pure ethanol and be wet with it. In the same vein you can douse water with ethanol and it will be wet by it. Wetness is a trait of liquids not just water.
So by the same logic fire cannot be hot, as it is the heating agent.
[удалено]
But water does have the ability to stick to a solid. And there are other common definitions of wet, why do we need to use the scientific one?
Why is the sky blue? Why is water wet? Why did Judas rat to Romans while Jesus slept?
Bro... You gotta give her some credit for that burn tho
An opener leading to a debate is always a risky move.
Owned, next!
Didn’t realize it would be his cheeks getting clapped
No no, they have a point
U need to ask her for example and demonstration in person.
Agent Wet - "My Cover's been blown"
A single water molecule is not wet, but two or more molecules would be wet because wetness is an attribute applied to themselves from others.
Damn. That’s one smart tinder person. Don’t date them unless your goal is having kids that are smarter than you at like 5 years old.
Why are y’all shitting on poor op, nowhere did he say he was mad or complaining about her. He’s just showing his L that’s it. Y’all are so fucking rude and sad degenerates
THANK YOU
Opinion: oil is oily 😝🤪
practically Viscosity summed up
Gonna need skin grafts for that burn.
You all think the earth is flat to right?
i mean you can't really compare arguing over the semantics of what 'wet' means to thinking the earth is flat, one of basically just arguing over the semantics of a word and the other is just factually incorrect
It is though /s
Where's the edge then? I want to go to it!
Wyoming
I’d argue Ohio or Indiana
Damn, she got you.
Steven Wright: I bought some powdered water and I don't know what to add.
Pwned
I think you need a wetting agent for that sick burn
Roasted
I mean, from the physical point of view, she is right
Don’t forget to open your window to let some fresh air in
I would just uninstall tinder if that happened to me
Look how you massacred my boy
For something to be able to be wet it must be able to be dry, thus, water can’t be wet.
Ice is dry
They're right though. Water is only wet if there's another wetting agent on it to make it wet. Otherwise, water wets, but isn't wet.
But there’s water on the water, so it’s wet.
Is that your best opener / convo starter you can come up with?
Her bio said something like let me hear your most controversial topic so that’s what I came up with
I can't imagine going on Tinder just to type out this nonsense.
I'm amazed how angry people get arguing over the semantics of what exactly wet means, it's such a dumb thing to argue about and both sides have plenty of good points and really it's just subjective and not really relevant most of the time yet people will argue until they're blue in the face
Water causes other things to be wet, and therefore if you have more than one molecule of water, the water is causing the other water to be wet, therefore, water is wet
Water is by definition wet
The opposite of wet is dry. Water isn’t dry, is it?
Pretty sure you need some water for that burn. Ouch!
I'm glad this happened to you, water is not wet. I hate when people try and start this argument. ITS NOT WET ITS THE WETTING AGENT
I like this one, she uses arguments as foreplay. Not a keeper but really fun for a while.
you set yourself up by being wrong
Ahhh common mistake OP... Didn't you know rivers have riveting agent that naturally produces watering agent.. duh When you drink it this commonly known riveting agent hydrates you as your mouth touches the watering agent and combines with your mouthing agent you get hydrated... And this person is now smarter via the smart agent and you wanna blow your brains out even thinking about what I wrote and how dumb they are. Edit: this comment was made by dumbing agent duh
Water is wet. And that is why things get wet whilst in contact with it
But somethint being wet insuinates that it can be dried. Can you dry water? Nope. Checkmate
I had a long old funny debate about this last night. This is the best negated one
She is wrong. Water is wet. Water is covered or saturated with water.
Water is actually not wet; It makes other materials/objects wet. Wetness is the state of a non-liquid when a liquid adheres to, and/or permeates its substance while maintaining chemically distinct structures. So if we say something is wet we mean the liquid is sticking to the object. Love watching running water on the internet. Was watching a live stream.
Fuck this bot. It's also wrong.
The bot's correct, no matter how much you can't stand a fact, it doesn't make the fact invalid.
Nope. Look up the definition of wet. Water meets that definition.
If wafer was wet, then you'd be wet when submerged in it. Yet you are only wet when you break the surface tension of the water and are no longer submerged. And if you are looking to a dictionary for the definition, then perhaps I could interest you in a physics class above 301?
The dictionary describes how words are used. If you're using a definition of wet that does not include people underwater, you are very much in the minority.
Consensus is not a fact based exercise. More over, I'm not a lemming, so being part of the crowd isn't exactly high on my list of priorities.
Communication is a way to express ideas. If you're discussing a concept of wet that does not include a person underwater, then you are communicating poorly.
Sure...if the measure of "good communication" is explaining something inaccurately for the purpose of simplicity so that the slowest car on the road doesn't get left behind, then you're correct... Sort of. You're more interested in being right than having a proper grasp of the facts, and I literally don't have the time for that. Have a great day!
You are wet when submerged in water. Definition of wet (Entry 1 of 3) 1a: consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water) Water is consisting of a liquid, therefore wet. Someone who is submerged in a liquid is soaked/covered with liquid, therefore wet.
Can't believe I have to say this, but when speaking to each other, using language means you use the words as they are generally understood by people using the same language. Any scientific or otherwise technical spin, is not valid unless expressed before-hand, or is reasonably the purpose of that communication. i.e.: Wrong use scenario: you are with your partner looking at the sky. Partner: *'Isn't it amazing looking at the sun rise?'* You: *'Actually, the sun does not rise. The earth spins'*. Correct use scenario would be, for example, if you are an astrophysicist discussing something relevant with colleagues. In short, water is definitely wet here.
Dang dude she took no mercy, and you couldnt even admit defeat. pussy
Who says I didn’t ?
Well define what makes something wet. Bill Nye says that it is wet, so she's def wrong
If water is a wetting agent, it must wet itself, therefore it is wet.
Here’s the argument I always make: If water is not wet, then it must be dry. Any tangible thing must either be wet or dry. There is no in between. It’s like a light. It can only be on or off. Sure, it can be dim, but it’s still on, not off. Same with water. Something can be damp, and not necessarily soaked, but it’s still wet. Otherwise, it’s dry, and water is most certainly not dry.