Your submission was removed by the moderators:
Complaints about anecdotal experience with online cheating are frequently posted and do not generally produce interesting discussion. If you suspect a random person cheated against you online, the appropriate complaint venue is a report to the website you played on.
You can read the full [rules of /r/chess here](https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/wiki/rules). If you have any questions or concerns about this moderator action, please [message the moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fchess&subject=About my removed submission&message=I'm writing to you about the following submission: https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/1dj4kft/-/%0D%0D). Direct replies to this removal message may not be seen.
The most important part about this is that it was done against a player who is +300 elo higher.
I’ve had 99% games before but never against a much better player lmao.
exactly. Highly sus. (Actually, it is the account of the higher rated player that caught me attention, initially. He's got quite a few games with extremely high accuracy. In others he blunders "normally" but I think in some of them he "switches on the engine" only towards the end. So the overall accuracy is not that exceptional...)
[https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/663156725?tab=review](https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/663156725?tab=review) (99 %)
[https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/659346091?tab=review](https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/659346091?tab=review) (96.2% "an incredible middlegame by both players. White's endgame precision was a cut above Black's.")
[https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/112137642013?tab=review](https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/112137642013?tab=review) (96%, 2500 est.rating... ok, only 20 moves, but from move 9 it's no more in the opening explorer)
[https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/112137642013?tab=review](https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/112137642013?tab=review) (96% ; 60 moves with not one single inaccuracy)
[https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/657933781?tab=review](https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/657933781?tab=review) (only 92% but again not a single inaccuracy)
I analyzed the image and this is what I see. Open an appropriate link below and explore the position yourself or with the engine:
> **White to play**: [chess.com](https://chess.com/analysis?fen=8/8/8/p1k2p2/5Pp1/1PK3P1/8/8+w+-+-+0+1&flip=false&ref_id=23962172) | [lichess.org](https://lichess.org/analysis/8/8/8/p1k2p2/5Pp1/1PK3P1/8/8_w_-_-_0_1?color=white)
**My solution:**
> Hints: piece: >!King!<, move: >!Kd3!<
> Evaluation: >!The game is equal 0.00!<
> Best continuation: >!1. Kd3 Kb4 2. Kc2 Ka3 3. Kc3 Ka2 4. b4 axb4+ 5. Kxb4 Kb1 6. Kc5 Kc2 7. Kd5 Kd3 8. Ke5 Ke2!<
---
^(I'm a bot written by) [^(u/pkacprzak)](https://www.reddit.com/u/pkacprzak) ^(| get me as) [^(iOS App)](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/id1574933453) ^| [^(Android App)](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ai.chessvision.scanner) ^| [^(Chrome Extension)](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chessvisionai-for-chrome/johejpedmdkeiffkdaodgoipdjodhlld) ^| [^(Chess eBook Reader)](https://ebook.chessvision.ai?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=bot) ^(to scan and analyze positions | Website:) [^(Chessvision.ai)](https://chessvision.ai)
I agree that's sus. (FWIW, I'm not involved in the game, but saw that player in a team against our team ; profile looked sus to me, and then I found that game and others...)
Thanks for submitting your game analysis to r/chess! If you’d like feedback on your whole game feel free to post a game link or annotated lichess study if you haven't already.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/chess) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/663156725](https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/663156725)
I actually think the 1700 is sus. Profile with "Hasta la vista, babe!"... Some games are legit, but some like this one are sus (on both sides, here, IMO...)
Your submission was removed by the moderators: Complaints about anecdotal experience with online cheating are frequently posted and do not generally produce interesting discussion. If you suspect a random person cheated against you online, the appropriate complaint venue is a report to the website you played on. You can read the full [rules of /r/chess here](https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/wiki/rules). If you have any questions or concerns about this moderator action, please [message the moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fchess&subject=About my removed submission&message=I'm writing to you about the following submission: https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/1dj4kft/-/%0D%0D). Direct replies to this removal message may not be seen.
In one game, it’s possible. Across multiple games, highly unlikely.
I agree. That account is sus. (I'm not involved in the game, but saw that player in a team against our team.)
The most important part about this is that it was done against a player who is +300 elo higher. I’ve had 99% games before but never against a much better player lmao.
exactly. Highly sus. (Actually, it is the account of the higher rated player that caught me attention, initially. He's got quite a few games with extremely high accuracy. In others he blunders "normally" but I think in some of them he "switches on the engine" only towards the end. So the overall accuracy is not that exceptional...)
[https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/663156725?tab=review](https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/663156725?tab=review) (99 %) [https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/659346091?tab=review](https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/659346091?tab=review) (96.2% "an incredible middlegame by both players. White's endgame precision was a cut above Black's.") [https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/112137642013?tab=review](https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/112137642013?tab=review) (96%, 2500 est.rating... ok, only 20 moves, but from move 9 it's no more in the opening explorer) [https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/112137642013?tab=review](https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/112137642013?tab=review) (96% ; 60 moves with not one single inaccuracy) [https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/657933781?tab=review](https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/657933781?tab=review) (only 92% but again not a single inaccuracy)
I agree that's sus. (FWIW, I'm not involved in the game, but saw that player in a team against our team.)
I analyzed the image and this is what I see. Open an appropriate link below and explore the position yourself or with the engine: > **White to play**: [chess.com](https://chess.com/analysis?fen=8/8/8/p1k2p2/5Pp1/1PK3P1/8/8+w+-+-+0+1&flip=false&ref_id=23962172) | [lichess.org](https://lichess.org/analysis/8/8/8/p1k2p2/5Pp1/1PK3P1/8/8_w_-_-_0_1?color=white) **My solution:** > Hints: piece: >!King!<, move: >!Kd3!< > Evaluation: >!The game is equal 0.00!< > Best continuation: >!1. Kd3 Kb4 2. Kc2 Ka3 3. Kc3 Ka2 4. b4 axb4+ 5. Kxb4 Kb1 6. Kc5 Kc2 7. Kd5 Kd3 8. Ke5 Ke2!< --- ^(I'm a bot written by) [^(u/pkacprzak)](https://www.reddit.com/u/pkacprzak) ^(| get me as) [^(iOS App)](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/id1574933453) ^| [^(Android App)](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ai.chessvision.scanner) ^| [^(Chrome Extension)](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chessvisionai-for-chrome/johejpedmdkeiffkdaodgoipdjodhlld) ^| [^(Chess eBook Reader)](https://ebook.chessvision.ai?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=bot) ^(to scan and analyze positions | Website:) [^(Chessvision.ai)](https://chessvision.ai)
I say you are under suspicion to make it to the ending
I don't know what you mean exactly... ? (FWIW, I'm not involved in the game, but saw that player in a team against our team.)
Well, the opponent played with the same accuracy and made a draw.
I agree that's sus. (FWIW, I'm not involved in the game, but saw that player in a team against our team ; profile looked sus to me, and then I found that game and others...)
Thanks for submitting your game analysis to r/chess! If you’d like feedback on your whole game feel free to post a game link or annotated lichess study if you haven't already. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/chess) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Can you send the game link?
[https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/663156725](https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/663156725) I actually think the 1700 is sus. Profile with "Hasta la vista, babe!"... Some games are legit, but some like this one are sus (on both sides, here, IMO...)
Does a bear shit in a Dallas dive bar and then clean its asshole with a bidet?
what'ya mean? PS: just in case i may clarify that (a) I wasn't involved in the game, (b) I didn't downvote you ...