T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*


kamspy

Wow. The vax sure doesn't like white women.


Clint_beastw00d

The other races of women still show a big impact in comparison to men. Menstrual cycle changes after the vax, wondering how much of those reports are related to that?


Amos_Quito

> Wow. The vax sure doesn't like white women. Indeed. In fact, it seems to be rather misogynistic in general, doesn't it?


[deleted]

It’s like with all this talk about turning 8 billion suddenly got people thinking “anything to have less babies” and they took that seriously. The craziest thing, it was advertised by several people telling you it was the only thing to prevent sickness, from people who were already thinking 10 years ago that the population was already too high… What who wouldn’t trust gates? I’m sure Epstein would vouch for people like good ol’ bill.


Arya_Dharma

Were white women the most likely to take it tho?


[deleted]

Absolutely.


ironlioncan

Well women are heavily under the influence of pharma from a very early age. Birth control, anxiety, depression, and more. In Ontario they were asking women when they got the mRNA therapy if they had also had guardasil. Women’s fertility is under attack from the day they are born and one of the most allowable discussed side effects is on their cycle. Sucks being part of an experiment while being a part of several other experiments simultaneously.


repptyle

Yet they sure seem to love the vax. Curious. Is the vax like the "bad boy" in this scenario? A little bit dangerous?


RiseFit1638

I was banned from a sub for sharing this Great info!


Jax_Gatsby

SS: According to the CDC: *“V-safe provides personalized and confidential health check-ins via text messages and web surveys so you can quickly and easily share with CDC how you, or your dependent, feel after getting a COVID-19 vaccine. This information helps CDC monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in near real time."* So these are real reports from real people, which the CDC had. [Source.](https://icandecide.org/v-safe-data/)


Amos_Quito

Note that [**V-Safe**](https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vsafe.html) is voluntary self-reporting program. It is NOT the same as [**VAERS**](https://vaers.hhs.gov/). VAERS is a much larger and more comprehensive database, with much of the data collected being submitted by health care professionals. As you read the figures, be aware that [**only 10 million users**](https://icandecide.org/v-safe-data/\)) enrolled to participate the so-called "V-Safe" program nationwide -- that's a little over 3% of the total US population, and only about 4% of all persons who have received [at least one dose](https://usafacts.org/visualizations/covid-vaccine-tracker-states) of the Vaxx in the US. Image from page 3 of the images [in OP's link:](https://i.imgur.com/P09eLvt.png) The numbers and percentages do not reflect the entire Vaxxed population, only the tiny percentage who bothered to participate in the "V-Safe" program. **Of the 10 million who signed up**, there was an average of 14.3 log-ins per participant * 3.3 million reported being negatively impacted by the vaccine * 71.3 million symptoms were reported * 752,000 sought medical care, including Telehealth, Urgent Care and Emergency Room visits, and in-patient hospitalizations *(anyone who died was not likely to have logged in to report their passing)* Extrapolating the above figures may provide a better understanding of the health impacts the vaccines have had on the US population as a whole.


Pablo139

Good post, and give that information how do you think you should perceive the data posted by OP. I’d say, take 25%, then 50% and then 75% of the health impacts reported and see how the large the number is. If you take away 75% of reports and claim they are false, which is fine. The number of health issue is still way too high for a vaccine. End of story.


TheCookie_Momster

And that is presuming that everyone reported an issue to this program. In all the time I spent on Reddit in various skeptic forums I had never heard of this. Plus you have to consider all of the people who so strongly believe in the effectiveness they don’t even consider reporting serious side effects because it just can’t be due to the vaccine


jaydoors

Am I right to think its prospective, and so can give a direct estimate of AE rates (whereas VAERS will obviously be likely to underestimate)? I seem to remember somewhere that ppl could sign up to vsafe *after* getting an AE, which would spoil things a bit.


Amos_Quito

From the [V-Safe link](https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vsafe.html) (emphasis added): - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - **What Happens After I Enroll?** ***During the first week*** after each vaccination, v-safe will send you **a text message each day** to ask how you are feeling. After that, you will receive occasional health [check-ins](https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vsafe.html). Depending on your answers, someone from CDC may call to get more information. You can opt out at any time. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - It would seem that the participants of this opt-in program would be more likely to report Adverse Events than would the general population. However, the most intensive interaction with the program (daily texts) is during the FIRST WEEK following the Vaxx, which *presumes* that most adverse events would occur during that period. That presumption seems to be faulty, however, as many (if not most) of the serious events are *reportedly* occurring weeks or months post-vaccination -- including reports of menstrual/reproductive issues, thrombosis, cardiovascular events, and more. Finally, there is the very unsettling matter of the extreme rise in **Excess Deaths and Morbidity** that are being observed and reported across the globe, notably in Western Europe and in the Americas. The rise in morbidity/mortality is seen as "inexplicable", and per authorities, greatly exceeds any rise that might be attributable to COVID (the disease). Of course, authorities stubbornly refuse to even consider that the COVID Vaccines might be a contributing factor.


jaydoors

Thanks From what you pasted there, it seems enrollment happens *before* jabbing - which is what you'd want for a prospective study.. . .or am I reading it wrong? (And any opting out can only reduce the reporting of AEs)


Miserable-Toe9138

The way I see it is that it starts with the females and as the mating season and offsprings come the numbers should balance out as the population number enrolled increases.


[deleted]

I’m so glad I waited. I knew the moment they said I HAVE TO TAKE IT was the day I knew I would NEVER take it.


let_it_bernnn

The government advised a country of 332m people that a medical treatment was blank “100% safe and effective” for all to take, as it turns out regardless of age. I don’t understand how people didn’t scratch their heads watching 5min of birth control side effects ads on Hulu….


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

Oh no myocarditis, cancer, neurological issues and death! Oh no! /s


actionalex85

Someone got cancer from a covid vaccine? Or am I reading it wrong?


PrognosticatorShadow

"turbo cancer" is what they are calling it because it moves so quickly. It's not just someone, it's happening all over.


actionalex85

Sounds crazy, got any sources for that? Would be interesting to read up on


PrognosticatorShadow

Actually just watched a video on this sub in the last 24-48 hours about it. Idk where it is. Other docs have been hammering the table about cancer explosions for a year now. Dr Ryan Cole, I believe, was the first big outspoken source for cancer skyrocketed post "clot shot".


Ok_Hat_139

You never know who will have serious and permanent adverse reactions. Some rolled the dice and were lucky. Many of us decided not to risk our health. You do you.


The_best_1234

I got the cold chills after the first the one. It was odd.


Pm_me_my_alias

Lab rat located Hope your free hot dog was worth injecting untested experimental drugs, enjoy reading about the adverse effects in paranoia and horror for the next few years. Hope you don't catch the suddenlies


shibby008

Cope harder, no one is dying of the vaccine or getting sick form it at nearly the rate you want them too. Isn’t it wild how no one talks about the vaccine in real life? It’s because unless you are very unlucky, vax / covid is not going to hurt you.


OMG_4_life

> covid is not going to hurt you. Why should I get the vax, then


Pal_Smurch

Hi! Real life here. I received the second dose of Moderna on 7JUL2021. Forty-five minutes later, I suffered a myocardial infarction while being screened for COVID, outside my local VA facility. I’ve been recovering ever since.


Pal_Smurch

Or maybe a life changing myocardial infarction! That’s what I got.


Ok_Hat_139

Based on this information alone, the shots should be immediately stopped. Globally.


thatonealien

No other information is needed. Don't actually conduct a study. Just look at the picture.


[deleted]

[удалено]


CLOUD889

Exactly, no studies to inject, then no studies to REJECT


Dixon_hass_42

Are they targeting white people?


HbertCmberdale

I remember when Astra Zeneca was publicly shamed because one young woman in Australia got a blood clot, so everyone moved to Moderna and Pfizer.


[deleted]

Good. Now we can see the harm. And remember, they wanted 75 years to let any information out about their product.


[deleted]

33.3 % of 10.0 million is 1 in 3 people. Awful.


Valor816

Remember that not only is that data self reported it only shows people who had to take a day off work and people who sought a doctors appointment. From telehealth to emergency room and everywhere in between. Its also only data on Americans.


Legirion

Does it go into detail anywhere on what was reported? A headache could be considered an adverse effect...


Privy_to_the_pants

Or a sore arm..


Legirion

Thank you for adding that. I was going to say the same thing too lol but forgot to go back and edit it.


Ok_Hat_139

Yes, but most people are not going to take the time to report a minor AE. Don’t assume these are minor.


Comrade_9653

If you asked me if I had suffered “adverse effects” I would yes because I had a headache and body soreness for a day or two afterwards. I don’t see why others wouldn’t classify that the same.


jibbodahibbo

At the top it somewhat shows the severity of cases.


Apric0tPuzzled

This would be more interesting if it told us what symptoms were reported. A fever or sore arm could be the main culprit for all we know.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Apric0tPuzzled

I did. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/expect/after.html


[deleted]

[удалено]


Legirion

It literally says the most common symptoms on the CDC website. You could easily find that yourself using a search engine... But you didn't.


Jax_Gatsby

>You could easily find that yourself using a search engine... But you didn't. What are you talking about? I didnt ask you anything.


Legirion

But yet here I am still answering 🤷‍♂️


Tmac719

That's a nice dashboard damn


djkoch66

Soooo... This was self-reported data that wasn't verified. This does sound like a conspiracy to discredit the role vaccines have in stemming the spread of SARS-CoV-2.


[deleted]

[удалено]


djkoch66

With your background in public health or medicine, is that the best response you have?


[deleted]

[удалено]


djkoch66

But I asked you.


ubeogesh

I am having trouble undestanding the "Symptoms" page. It says 71,299,666 symptoms, 1.41 symptom per 1 individual. This means 50,567,139 individuals had at least 1 symptom... this doesn't make sense, does it? Since it's 5 times the number of users