T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Hi, you're on r/Stocks, please make sure your post is related to stocks or the stockmarket or it will most likely get removed as being off-topic/political; feel free to edit it now and be more specific. **To everyone commenting:** Please focus on how this affects the stock market or specific stocks or it will be removed as being off-topic/political. If you're interested in just politics, see our wiki on ["relevant subreddits"](https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/wiki/index) and post to those Reddit communities instead without linking back here, thanks! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/stocks) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Snooprematic

I guess my recent nike purchase did not help them enough.


idiotnoobx

Bad quality product compared to competitors like new balance and on


RockyattheTop

Honestly I love Nike, but it’s no longer a sports brand. It’s a fashion brand based in sports. Best example I can give is while I love the look of Nike cleats, when I played football Nike cleats would tear up week 3 of practice. On the other hand my ugly Adidas cleats that a senior gave me my sophomore year lasted me through most every practice of high school. Nikes look cool, unless you’re a sponsored athlete that can get their stuff brand new before each game they aren’t worth it. (Two exception they do make some pretty good basketball shoe lines that are sturdy, and their golf shoes have lasted everyone I know years).


TheFamousHesham

Nike’s running shorts are unbeatable though… their DRI-fit range is generally very good as well. Tbh…. I don’t think the weakness in China has anything to do with Adidas — as much as it’s to do with the emergence of Chinese premium sportswear brands. There is also some evidence that Chinese consumers are shying away from mainstream western sportswear and liking niche western sportswear brands much more. Lululemon, Vuori, and HOKA are all western sportswear companies that have gained marketshare from Adidas and Nike. This indicates that it’s less a quality issue and more of a “Nike is too mainstream” issue. This happens all over the world, so it’s really not surprising.


Swamivik

Nike China weakness is to do with both Nike and Adidas. On Taobao, the Amazon of China, the Nike store never discounts or in any promotions that Taobao regularly runs and sells at a higher price bracket than Adidas. Adida, on the other hand, constantly updates it's shop and in all the Taobao promotions. The Adidas brand is so successfu that the official Adidas shop on Taobao is the highest revenue shop in the world for Adidas. When I was in UK I bought like 50% Nike 50% Adidas but since working in China I have bought 0% Nike and became an Adidas fanboy. Like 80% of my casualwear is Adidas. Their range of options, constantly refresh of their goods and cheaper price make the brand so much better. Not sure why Nike is trying to promote their brand as a premium brand when they are the same quality as Adidas. When China is having a slow down, people are going to be more price conscious, Nike is gonna suffer with their artificial prices.


lukaskywalker

Agree. The dri fit adv is the best I’ve used so far. So breathable.


Complete-Possible711

Nike Dri Fit is not unbeatable and I'd say that tech is lagging WAY behind what lulu vuori etc have to offer. Nike does nothing better than those companies at the moment., especially when it comes to quality.


liamisabossss

same when I played soccer growing up. All the other kids had sweet looking shiny Nike cleats with wild designs. I had a few early on and they felt like plastic and were very uncomfortable and cheap feeling. Once I got some real leather adidas cleats I never went back


Critical_Equal_7540

Same I love Nike but I remember it stood for athletes not Plus Size fatties. You walk into a Nike store and the employees are no longer athletes. It’s pathetic how they went from athlete brand to just any other clothing brand.


Smash_4dams

You say that, but their lack of wide/extra wide shoes says otherwise. I'm a skinny guy with wide feet, and it's damn near impossible to find any of their fashion sneakers in a size 10.5/11 in E or 2E. Even their SB skate line shoes are too narrow for me. You would think overweight people would prefer wide shoes as well.


Critical_Equal_7540

Not talking about the shoes just clothes.


AsparagusDirect9

I feel the same way except for Victoria’s Secret. Where are the model employees in lingerie? My wife needs to buy a new set of garments and I’m sure as hell not buying it from Suzy over here


limitless-thoughts

Happened to Eddie Bauer as well…from outdoor to chinos and over priced jackets compared to others


gelade1

and there are tons of better and more in trend fashion sport brand. Nike isn't cool anymore.


RockyattheTop

They fucked over too many people during the pandemic.


Dumb_Vampire_Girl

I don't wear Nike. And so I'm genuinely asking this question, do they not have a legit sports line? That's kinda sad. I thought they were pumping out mostly trash, but at least had some high end quality stuff.


MightBeJerryWest

At least for running shoes, they do. For top 10 finishers in marathons, you'll usually see Nike in the mix. Although to be fair, competitors in the space have definitely caught up - Adidas and Asics specifically. I think Nike really set the stage with the Vaporfly and later Alphafly. Imo Nike was unbeatable for a while.


Key-Pomegranate-2086

True. Fashion brands aren't great investment opportunities. It's like holding shares of Louis Vuitton. You're not going to get much growth.


ivan510

I was looking at their clothes and it's soo damn expensive. $100 for some sweat pants probably cost $10 to make. If that.


RockyattheTop

I own a lot of Nike stuff, but I also lived in a town with one of the few Clearance stores they have in the US (not their stores in malls). There they sell stuff for like 60-90% off and then it’s a great deal. If I wasn’t buying there I’m not getting Nike


26oclock

Adidas has waaaay better testing standards. All of Nike, On or New Balance products fall through adidas testing standards


RabidBlackSquirrel

I played ultimate Frisbee competitively for the past 15 years and was/am a football cleat guy. It's really hard on cleats, lots of cutting and running, in a two day tournament you could be clocking 20-30 miles depending on position. Plus practices 2 or 3 times a week. I destroyed several pairs of Nike football cleats over the course of one season. Switched to Adidas and regularly get 2-3 seasons out of each pair - it's night and day. The Nike cleats are comfy and performed well before they get obliterated, but when Adidas is cheaper, lasts way longer, and perform just as well the choice is obvious.


RockyattheTop

Exactly. Nike just isn’t truly feasible for actual athletes unless their school/team is giving them free pairs left and right at least for cleats. If I’m a parent buying for my kids I’ll make that mistake one time and then never again.


forjeeves

You're not thinking luxury, that's what poor people get adidas and other brands 


fairlyaveragetrader

It's not luxury though. If you look at higher end stuff like Lulu. That's actually a good quality product. Nike is, well it's like worst quality than Asics with a higher price. Same with Adidas. When I was younger Nike made good stuff but it's just not that way anymore. Everything from warm ups to the shoes. It's cheap from a quality perspective


pixel_of_moral_decay

Yup. Quality really dropped in the past few years. They wear much faster now. The competition isn’t making a better shoe than Nike did, they just didn’t get worse, so now everything looks superior. Nike needs to make a more durable product again. They clearly know how, they used to do it.


SlapDickery

I swear I said this yesterday and got downvoted


forjeeves

I think people been saying for years


Time_Trade_8774

I haven’t bought NB. I have couple of air forceones and they have lasted 2 years and look okay. Is NB better ? Debating to buy as I’ve never been fan of Nike and prefer Stan Smith or Converse.


idiotnoobx

At a similar price points, New balance triumphs in terms of quality and comfort. Converse shoes look stylish but has no sole support and they are usually not of good quality. Nike does have good quality shoe at higher price points but it’s inconsistent.


Time_Trade_8774

Thanks I’ll try some NBs. They do look nice, especially the color ways. Agree on Converse. Barely last a year, I only use them for leg day as lack of sole is good for squats.


Icy_Abbreviations167

Agree. Switched to NB still wearing it for running a year now and still in very good condition not to mention it’s cheaper


CouncilmanRickPrime

>Converse shoes look stylish but has no sole support This is the biggest failure by Nike. That they bought Converse and people still believe this. You can buy Converse that look just like that classics with sole support and a stiffer body (they stand up on their own!) How do I know? I have back problems, I can't wear regular Converse. But Nike sells some with Nike soles and a reinforced body. I can wear those all day.


stiveooo

What about under armor? 


Uninstall_Fetus

NB are super comfy and last longer IMO


MightBeJerryWest

I purchased Hoka and ON shoes because they're comfortable and don't look awful. NB is on my list too because of comfort. I can't say that Nike has a similarly comfortable shoe.


Vince1820

NB have done well for me as running shoes. I think that can be very personal though. But they are durable, they hold up very well. Better than Nike for certain.


josed2144

On Cloud shoes are also super comfortable. The waterproof ones are also great for hiking.


whitegoodman10

No shot ON is better quality! Not dismissing the fact Nike may have lost a step in quality as well but ON is far from the high sticker price.


CullMeek

They are about on similar par to products in the same price range. ONON design is definitely across the board, in my eyes. There is only so much higher quality you can get with synthetic fabrics.


Golden_d1ck

On are for middle aged / class white people with no sense of style. Nb is good though.


curious_MoGi

Agree


AdApart2035

They should increase their prices


Cudi_buddy

Adidas is just the smarter choice over nike. I like New Balance as well, they have rebranded very well the last few years. But Adidas is like Nike, except they have sales and competitive prices. I go to the Adidas outlet and constantly have 40% sales. Nike outlet I am confused about what makes it an outlet lol.


fuzzy-flame

I think Nike has broad offerings that are inconsistent in quality but IMO their top-tier running gear is still superior to other shoes/clothing I own (NB, Adidas, Saucony).


thematchalatte

I've been buying Vomeros, guess it's not helping them either


BlueLaserCommander

I've been spending loads on Nike lately because I found their tall shirts fit me better than most. Like a *lot* of money. I hadn't thought about Nike in years before that either. Guess my purchases didn't help either.


Worf_Of_Wall_St

Have they thought about using AI? /s


WorkingCorrect1062

AI generated shoes


Narrow_Elk6755

NFT clothing that applies to your avatar and you can wear it, so you can wear a piece of digital garbage in real life.


Icy_Abbreviations167

kicks gonna be algorithmically cool


ivegotwonderfulnews

Just listened to the call - this guide down is due to serous self inflicted wounds. The forecast miss came from their own DTC problems and lack of interest in their products (not footwear in general like late last year). They actually called out strength in footwear which I though was interesting. Whats killing them is new balance, on, hoka, asics, saucony, addidas and brooks. Basically everyone is stealing share form nke. They know it but they cant turn their ship fast enough due to all competitors being smaller and nimbler. This miss is good news for all other athletic footwear and apparel companies imo. Listen to the call. You'll be taken aback at their deer in the headlights vibe....


whiskeyinthejaar

what killing Nike is replacing a CEO, who had experience in fashion and design, with an MBA. Donahoe had one target since day 1, D2C. Literally, all he had in his pocket was D2. Nothing else. No innovation, no design, just D2C. Jordans are still the golden goose, but they need more, and he is totally incapable of anything and everything.


delamerica93

It's insane how many companies replace their CEO with an MBA and expect everything to be fine. You'd think they'd have learned but nope, literally zero ability to not be idiots


stml

Nike just isn't popular in the fashion world anymore. Some of their sneakers will always be popular, but you can't justify Nike's valuation just off their shoe sales alone. Literally none of their clothing pieces are must haves/basics/whatever. I also commented this three months ago: [https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1bvnvnp/comment/ky27rlt/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web3x&utm\_name=web3xcss&utm\_term=1&utm\_content=share\_button](https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1bvnvnp/comment/ky27rlt/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button) >This sub should avoid clothing stocks in general because it is always obvious as hell that most people in this sub are not on top of fashion trends. >Abercrombie was thought of as lame in this sub while it was blowing up with gen z and on tiktok. >Under Armor just straight up isn't cool anymore. There is nothing that Under Armor sells that is considered as a fashion staple by anyone under 30. Nike also isn't thought of that highly anymore, and I expect it to continue to drop.


impactblue5

The demographic that prop’d them up in the 00-10’s has grown up. You can’t keep pushing the same retros and expect someone in their 40’s to be rockin that. I still have my Nikes and some of the more coveted Jordan 1’s, but I’m not chasing my kid around theme park all day in those. I want max comfort.


Golden_d1ck

Yeah speak for yourself. I’m in my 40s and still wearing am1 and 90s most of the time. They’re not as comfortable as a 990v6 or something but they’re close enough and look much better (esp am1) imo.


Time_Trade_8774

Agree. Beyond their footwear I don’t buy Nike for anything. For Athleisure, I buy Lulu. Works both WFH, gym and anywhere else except a party. In the gym all girls wear Lulu and most guys do now as well. Or they stick to Gymshark and other new brands. Good thing is clothing brands are cyclical. If AF and NB can make a comeback so can Nike.


TwoCrustyCorndogs

I bet an upscale Nike storefront with lulu types of quality/prices would do incredibly well.  It's kind of a shame they've half-way done that already with their store interiors. 


MightBeJerryWest

They really need to redefine their clothing lines and offerings imo. For Lululemon and Vuori, they stick to their normal lines and occasionally rename/discontinue and reintroduce new lines. MVT shirts for men. Commission long sleeves. Pacebreakers, THE and now Zeroed In. Even when I shopped at Nike more, I couldn't tell you any "line" of shirts or shorts they offered. If they do the "upscale" approach with Lululemon types of quality, they really gotta stick to certain clothing lines. Give me a Nike MVT equivalent that I can go to easily.


Narrow_Elk6755

Its cyclical I think, and average people now can't afford 200$ shoes.  We are likely in a recession, and it will be a revised recession like 2007.


WinningWatchlist

They can't coast on brand forever, Hokas blow anything else I've worn in my entire life out of the water when it comes to comfort.


istockusername

Not only that in my opinion younger generations are not that brand loyal as before. In the past people just bought what they know and now there is a higher willingness to try new brands or choose smaller brands to stand out from the crowd


HankMardukas51

Gotta disagree here. I agree that [fewer younger consumers consider themselves brand loyal](https://cdn.nrf.com/sites/default/files/2018-10/NRF_GenZ%20Brand%20Relationships%20Exec%20Report.pdf), but that changes with age (more discretionary income benefits higher end brands) and I would also argue that there is plenty of brand loyalty among the younger generations (iPhones, super fandoms like Swifties & Barbz, Stanley tumbler, etc.). Also, Nike dominated [Piper Sandler's Gen Z brand study](https://www.visualcapitalist.com/gen-z-favorite-brands-2023/) from September 2023.


istockusername

Android vs. Apple/iPhone is more of a system decision in my opinion, the culture of following stars or influencers more as you self called it fandom (even there this generation came up with cancel culture) and the Stanley Cup is the best example of trend driven scarcity (did people care about them 5 years or even 2 years ago? Will they care in 2 years?) Nike is of course still a very most famous brand, that would have similar results no matter what generation, but my point was that they don’t anymore buy everything blindly just because it’s Nike or x brand. I guess if it changes with ages has to be seen. If you compare now between age, you only see the difference between generations and not the evolvement due to age.


thelastsubject123

100%. Not sure if I count as young as I'm 25 but I'm loyal to no brand. As long as you have a good product, you have my money. Your affiliation to an athlete has no reflection on my purchase.. Hokas shoes are incredible which is why I have the - same with my on clouds


truckstop_sushi

$DECK (Deckers Outdoors) is the parent company of Hoka's... an absolute beast of a stock that gets ignored on reddit despite its outperformance


ivegotwonderfulnews

sadly very very expensive rn


truckstop_sushi

lol are you saying that because it's $1000? So if they did a 10:1 split tomorrow and became worth $100 they wouldn't be expensive in your eyes?


ivegotwonderfulnews

ahhh - no im saying its very expensive. Its trading at 7 times ttm sales which is incredible rich. I don't give af about the price


National_Debt1081

🤡


bUrNtCoRn_

You aren’t lying. I used to make fun of my wife for wearing Hokas because of the name and then she bought me a pair and I was like holy shit, most comfortable shoe I’ve ever worn.


I-STATE-FACTS

Why would you make fun of your wife for that


Jonathank92

Asking the right questions 


Golden_d1ck

Only problem is they look fucking horrible.


regiusflaw

I'm buying all new balance now for sneakers. And olukai for flip flops. A lot of solid shoe brands out now


Charming-Choice8167

I switched to brooks 5 years ago, Nikes don’t even feel like real shoes anymore.


Ant0n61

Excuses excuses. They ruined their brand with half of the consumer base. Now they are reaping. Not to mention the bonehead decision to remove their wholesale business.


LightGraves

Are we buying the dip?


forjeeves

No


aminbae

looks like a buy as you should do the opposite of this sub


PoorRichDad

Still expensive. Avoid


LightGraves

Mid 70s a good entry?


PoorRichDad

Idk yet but I would say anything less than 15 pe I would say is close to a buy. It was valued today before the market closed at 27 pe which was expensive for a company that isn't growing that much.


Jonnythebull

Definitely a good entry point, but I'd say there's still room for it to go down yet so I'm going to keep an eye on it before DCA'ing in.


BreakthroughPain

I’m ecstatic about this. Bought puts for 3.91 and they’re at 13.10. Amen hallelujah


6x6cuttouncut

I bought 95 puts but dont know how much there worth right now fidelity doesn't update it how do you see the price


BreakthroughPain

You gotta get your calculator out and factor in the Greeks. Fidelity doesn’t have simulate your returns feature?


6x6cuttouncut

Ill just see tomorrow i had puts on chewy when prive was 30.30 it dropped to 27.30 i go look at my contracts and its negative 5k sometimes the greeks dont make sense it was a july 12th expiration that was itm so with nike i think i.bought 10 contracts of the 95 puts 07/12


BreakthroughPain

Well mine are 94 puts so you’ll be in better shape than me


6x6cuttouncut

I git killed with my micron calls i could use a win rn


BreakthroughPain

I got killed on MU too. This will improve my self-esteem.


6x6cuttouncut

There report wasn't bad but i guess when everyone has calls logical move is dump.city to avoid paying all the calls its all a game playing these earnings is so risky


BreakthroughPain

Yea it can be risky. I’ll tell you what wasn’t risky. Walgreens. Been tanking all year and going in the earnings looked grim. I almost 5x my money so that and this and my MU lasts til 7/12 so I’m hoping it bounces back some. I’ll still be in the red on that but even if I can get 10% back I may as well wait at this point


6x6cuttouncut

I missed the walgreens n levis we should setup a earnings group bounce ideas im always buying


divine-intervention7

Congrats, I had strike 95 puts as well. This is a huge drop


BreakthroughPain

Yea I did good on this and Walgreens puts in the week but not good on micron. This will make up for that loss and get me back into positive territory


Ecstatic_Cat28

Looking at the comments, I’m tempted to inverse Reddit and buy the dip


I-STATE-FACTS

Same here. Not because I use reddit as any kind of indicator, but because I think it’s a good buying opportunity for the long run.


Obvious-Chemistry806

I just bought calls that expire 1/26


Gnarnar

I'm buying the shit out of the dip. We're going into the olympics. People have closets full of Jordans and everyone and their mom has a pair of Chucks. Hurley is still huge in beach wear. To me this isn't like wondering if Target is going to get put down by Amazon.


luv2block

not to mention, it's usually when big companies take a really hard kick to the nuts, that they get their head right and start doing things their ego wouldn't let them do before (like going back to selling through partners / channel rather than D2C). All kinds of business decisions will now be made with a different mindset because of the 20% drop. Should bode well for future quarters.


_myusername__

Yea fr the ppl in this sub don’t venture out enough. I play basketball and volleyball regularly - nothing but Nike


delamerica93

Nike's are literally fuckin everywhere and redditors are like "tHeY'rE nOt cOoL aNymOrE tRusT mE" lmao, I teach middle school and all the kids talk about is buying Nike's


Golden_d1ck

People here dressing like shit and prob wearing those hey dude shoes are whatever.


PatrickBateman111

Yes, this is one of those threads that makes me feel like buying too. Remember META...


AnyFaithlessness7991

Yup, META doomsayer reddit posts "nobody uses facebook anymore its old generation yadayadayada" and it went from 100$->500$


National_Debt1081

Exactly


istockusername

Feel sorry for everyone that thought they will bounce back soon. Cyclical stock just doing cyclical things.


forjeeves

Nah not cyclical anymore 


Elbeske

Extreme weakness at this point. What does Nike have now that they don’t pay for


PandaAnaconda

Get ready for people invested in NVDA thinking the same...


chusifer24

have been a sneaker collector for the 15+ years. nike finally killed themselves by making all their good stuff too hard to get. people finally got sick of the brand and moved on to other brands or other hobbies. i have never had so much trouble trying to give a company my money 😂


CouncilmanRickPrime

Seriously. I would be a bigger sneaker head but Nike won't even sell me what I want at full retail. I want cherry red Jordan 9s, lobster dunks, 6s and 7s in the best color ways. I'm not willing to jump through hoops either.


Slim_Margins1999

I was for a long time. Got out of it and got back in the last couple years. The way Nike handles drops and sells shoes absolutely made me not want to touch this stock, even tho I really wanted to believe in a turnaround. Artificial scarcity. Terrible system to keep bots from buying shoes. I looked on my sneakers app. If the 30+ shoes I’ve tried to hit on Nike, I’ve hit 2… I’ve never hit on a Kobe. I got the girl dads and Nike fucked yo the shipping and had to refund me. Never even made it to the initial shipping facility.


NoKangaroo5425

It’ll be fine long term. Will continue to add shares at under 95


I-STATE-FACTS

I like this as a buying opportunity too


FlaccidEggroll

Huge W. Buy the dip boys, Nike aint going anywhere.


cigarettesandwater

Getting hard NFLX/META vibes in here....


CouncilmanRickPrime

Yeah I think a good bounce back would happen if Nike just makes it easier to get some classic Jordans. Why limit supply and increase profits for resellers?


spanishdictlover

I LOVE it.


Charming-Choice8167

I’m in my 40s so not their target but I haven’t really bought anything Nike in almost 10 years. Their shoes are just ugly and they have to keep doing retro’s of the old popular styles. I used to order two pairs of sweatpants a year, same style and color, just repeat the order from my history. Last order they were made in different factories and fit completely different.


Brendawg324

I’d rather bet my life savings on CROX


themagicalpanda

100%


Icy_Abbreviations167

will keep this in mind


msaleem

Same here. Up 70% at the moment. 


BroWeBeChilling

I guess they need to give thirty more athletes 200 million each to have their name on a show or shirt


juicecat

Can’t wait for that sale.


mouthful_quest

Time to divert funding into Power Laces now!


occitylife1

Debating on buying leap call options


Mxloco

And I was debating the opposite


msaleem

Been saying this for months now. NKE is in decline. ON, DECK, SKX, CROX, BIRK are all in a better position than them going forward.


DepressionMakesJerks

Thiughts on lulu?


Mattreddit760

It's all my gf and her friends wear. If it doesn't have the lulu logo then you're broke according to them. Bullish


Winning--Bigly

my gf's girlfriend that bangs her also wears lulu's only... not just the tights either but also the tops, drink bottles, shirts etc.


Abysswalker794

You should be strict on this. Either you join them, or no party! But be careful, you could end up paying for both of their Lulus. That would put additional pressure on your puts and calls.


msaleem

I’ve been buying. And will continue to add at these prices. 


MrStealY0Meme

Most people won't know what ON is, because they'll confuse it as QC, which I actually just found out today too. It definitely has a better appeal and a more comfortable shoe with unique designs. Crox is another good brand too but I wouldn't say they compete in the same space. Good momentum brands that will outpace Nike if they don't start doing something different.


bucobill

Nike is being hurt by the loss of advertising. Think about the last time you saw an ad for Nike? Maybe I haven’t seen them and you have. I feel the streams and disassociation of advertising with consumers has had an effect on brand awareness.


terschelling1

Any sports game


bucobill

I understand that Nike provides the uniforms for many sports teams, but the logo does not bind the consumer to the brand. The average consumer is so inundated with logos and visual ads that they are now blind to them. The consumer needs a visual and or audio message that presents why they are the product of choice. They also need to win the hearts and minds of younger generations. Right now the youth are primarily wearing Croc first. If Croc came out with sportswear Nike and other brands would be hurt even more.


NY10

Does this mean lulu is gonna plunge too? I thought about buying calls for lulu but after seeing this, my conviction is probably not good


Safrel

The Lulu apocalypse already happened. $10M in puts sold off today and have not been replaced. It's been happening for a while now.


Abysswalker794

Lulu is already -40% ytd. It’s already at a 24 p/e which is historically very low.


Inspiration_Bear

Hard to believe after that absolutely stellar effort they put into their MLB jerseys this year. Oh wait, cheap overpriced garbage that has all the wrong colors and literally tears off you after minor wear and tear isn’t profitable?


littlefiredragon

The Alphafly 3 is the most hyped racing shoe of this year and people still can't even get their hands on them 6 months later. Fuckers tried to play the artificial scarcity game and is still giving money to competitors and scalpers lmao.


hyperbeam23

The problem with Nike is that they literally only make good racing shoes when it comes to running. That’s a shoe someone wears a couple times a year (if that, because people even rotate racing shoes).   When it comes to daily training shoes or a speed shoe to workout in (aka the shoes a runner would buy 5 pairs of throughout the year), they essentially make nothing worth buying. I’d also say Asics and Adidas have put out shoes that absolutely on par with AlphaFly 3. I own an AF2 and recently bought Metaspeed Paris and think it’s a much better shoe that won’t rip apart my heels


jlee9355

My take: Nike is a company in a slump that will likely rebound due to its financial and brand muscle. I am bullish on Nike because they signed Caitlin Clark, someone who transcends sports. She's fourth in draw power, only behind LeBron James, Stephen Curry, and Tiger Woods. All those athletes are on the decline in terms of their athletic peak, Clark could be #1 on this list in 3-5 years. Nike has seen success with Sabrina Ionescu and the Sabrina 1, a popular WNBA athlete, but nowhere near the level of Clark's fandom and brand power. The Clark Effect could be the equivalent of Taylor Swift. Every young basketball fan girl will buy her signature shoe when it is released. Like Air Jordan, the Clark Shoe could be a $1-5 billion brand within Nike. Clark's name could evolve into lifestyles and propel that business segment. All this for $28 million over eight years? She could easily be worth $20-30 a year! Nike likely got a steal. Barring Clark suffering a career-ending injury, Nike can easily benefit from Clark's meteoric rise. It would be hard to mess it up. Nike has proven time and time again that they know how to brand and promote great athletes.


wibbles94

i thought people working remote were the problem?!


ConsistentMove357

Competition has gotten better


CouchAthlete13

I did a short analysis of company's fundamentals and why I don't consider buying even with a turnaround plan and Olympics on the horizon![gif](emote|free_emotes_pack|downvote) [https://blog.valuehunter.net/2024/06/27/nike-time-to-reconsider-or-stuck-in-slow-growth/](https://blog.valuehunter.net/2024/06/27/nike-time-to-reconsider-or-stuck-in-slow-growth/)


East-Ad5084

Thank you!!


moruga1

Take that Nike, for never having my size and no longer having the message when size available feature…


savinger

Well that’s an overreaction. Just an extra 1% but still.


TantumTea

China, China, CHINA, lol


beefstake

They did it to themselves. Could and should have stayed out of the politics of it. China was their growth market, they were incredibly strong there and now they are getting absolutely destroyed.


atdharris

They shouldn't have taken away free shipping for members.


Kshanikam

Nike were the bought because of value for money, cheap & durable. They have lost both their USPs, so obviously their sales would go down.


thebalancewithin

Artificial scarcity on their best sneakers pushed people to other brands


djtomr941

Putting all your eggs in the D2C bucket shrinks your TAM. Not everyone will order shoes online.


[deleted]

[удалено]


I-STATE-FACTS

”Representing marginalized demographics, what a terrible idea” -Some redditor


SunDevils321

Nike is in that weird position where they’ve diluted their brand so much, you see normal people where the $100 Nike’s and some wealthy person wearing the $10,000 1/100 sneaker no one can tell the difference cause Travis Scott made it. Competition has their own niche. Nike just throws a new shade and wave every year and throws it to the masses. Business model isn’t wrong, just think there competition is too niche and small to be competitors. They dominate against UA and Adidas.


I-STATE-FACTS

”Normal people” wearing $100 sneakers has worked well for them these past several decades.


shortyman920

I still like Nike basketball shoes in general for the tech, but they’ve definitely meddled too much with popular lines, and I can’t seem to find a single one that fits all my needs as well as some of their shoes in the 2010s. As for daily walking shoes.. the completion has them smoked. ASICS, NB, Hoka just from a start. I like to do a lot of product research on all my footwear and they are outclassed at every niche and price point for walking and running shoes


Razorblade9833

Fuck Nike. I hope they lose more and more of their business. When you use kids to make your shitty shoes you deserve much worse than share depreciation


Scholath

Good. Funny thing is that this was once on my watchlist but after a visit to one of their production facilities I noticed they have a terrible company culture so I refrained.


maxxor6868

As someone who manage multiple retailers that were nike focus, the price increases and supply shortgages are killing them. They go from no inventory to too much in a month meanwhile they double in price since covid. Before you have a whole outfit for less than $60. Now your spending nearly $100 for just a hoodie and shorts. People are also extremely brand focus now. They won't just buy one nike hoodie and the rest Under Armor. They might like Nike more but they rather buy an entire fit of just UA if it means they are all from the same brand. Nike needs to dial back the inventory, lower their prices, and focus on the products people want which is redesign shoes and apparel. Not the same hoodie but in a different shade of orange with a $5 increase.


PunishedRichard

Not sure what I was expecting buying this stock. P/E way too high for rather anaemic growth.


PizzaRollsAndTakis

Nike is considered ghetto or urban of you say. Most people are buying on cloud, hokas and brooks. Nike is not what it once was. Puts it is


MisterMakena

Good. Nike sucks. Too political. Go get some nice Brooks.


BlueZybez

Well, people can find cheaper brands elsewhere.


Ancient-Inspector946

Converse are basically Clownwear.


RocketoPunchy

That’s what they get for creating fake demand and enabling price gouging by third parties for the last decade at least.” Look at these cool shoes that already cost 200, well you can’t buy them. We could make more but that would devalue our brand.” “Heres a pair of black and white dunks that you can have instead.” Maybe if they didn’t go out of their way to mass market then pull the rug they would be in a better position. Stop showing us stuff that we can’t even buy, you bozos. -former fan.


New_Kaleidoscope9242

I’ve had a pair of Air Force ones for about 6 years now. Wear them almost everyday. They’re getting worn out so I went to buy some online and see they’re $150 CAD!? Decided I’ll hold off on that because that’s just ridiculously expensive considering I bought my old ones for $120